Emotional Bypassing Is A Sign Of Intelligence.

[Robed Mystic]

1 hour ago, Phil said:

There’s nothing wrong with beliefs about mind or that ism’s hold fundamental aspects of mind or death or egos for that matter. 

‘The world is consciousness’ is ‘things are consciousness’, or, panpsychism. 

Nothing wrong per se with believing ism’s either, just pointing out it isn’t a shared belief. 

Yes it is shared by some.  But yet your consciousness of what reality is can transcend belief. 

Edited February 26 by Robed Mystic

[Robed Mystic]

1 hour ago, Orb said:

Have you ever considered that it's possible to "go beyond" consciousness?

 

Consciousness is used differently in all the different spiritual schools. But I'm getting a feel for the version you're using.

 

If you believe stuff like "Mind is reality" and so on, you may be missing out on what is beyond Consciousness. 

What is beyond Consciousness is more Consciousness.  What is this? Hold out your hand and feel the air.  Exist.  That is Consciousness  

Edited February 26 by Robed Mystic

[Robed Mystic]

5 hours ago, Blessed2 said:

 

You are the one in a cult dude.

 

But just be right I guess.

 

Don't ever associate our teachings on Actualized to raped children.   Did you really do that?  Dude..that is disgraceful that you went there.   Seriously.   That's messed up.  Hate me all you want but don't go there- ever- and yeah I could teach you a lot about reality if you wanted to learn. But you don't. 

Edited February 26 by Robed Mystic

[Orb]

38 minutes ago, Robed Mystic said:

  Exist.  

Don't tell me what to do.

[Phil]

2 hours ago, Robed Mystic said:

Yes it is shared by me.  But yet my consciousness of what reality is can transcend belief. 

Introspection brother. 

15 minutes ago, Robed Mystic said:

Don't ever associate my teachings on Actualized to raped children.   Did I really do that?  Dude..that is disgraceful that I went there.   Seriously.   That's messed up.  Hate me all I want but don't go there- ever- and yeah I could teach myself a lot about reality if I wanted to learn. But I don't. 

Nobody’s asking. 

[Robed Mystic]

3 minutes ago, Phil said:

Introspection brother. 

Nobody’s asking. 

Sick.   

[Phil]

@Robed Mystic

This isn’t a teacher student environment. 🤍

[Robed Mystic]

13 minutes ago, Orb said:

Don't tell me what to do.

Existence is beyond Consciousness.   But Consciousness is Existence.  Notice the strange loop.  I'm not telling you to do anything.   I'm posting on a forum.   You can believe in materialism, idealism, or pure fantasy, for all I care.  Because at the end of the day I am just a figment of your imagination anyway.  Even if I physically existed right now I could cease to exist tomorrow.   And life goes on for you. 

Edited February 26 by Robed Mystic

[Blessed2]

7 minutes ago, Robed Mystic said:

Don't ever associate our teachings on Actualized to raped children.   Did you really do that?  Dude..that is disgraceful that you went there.   Seriously.   That's messed up.  Hate me all you want but don't go there- ever- and yeah I could teach you a lot about reality if you wanted to learn. But you don't. 

 

The underlined and bolded parts are why the association.

 

"Don't you ever associate our teachings with spiritual authority. I could teach you a lot about reality." 

 

[Robed Mystic]

3 minutes ago, Blessed2 said:

 

The underlined and bolded parts are why the association.

 

"Don't you ever associate our teachings with spiritual authority. I could teach you a lot about reality." 

 

But the raped children analogy? Just admit you were wrong there bro and we can go on with our day.  That won't be sustainable and you know it.  Your lucky you didn't get a warning for that.  

[Blessed2]

1 minute ago, Robed Mystic said:

But the raped children analogy? Just admit you were wrong there bro

 

Yeah, maybe it was a bit too provocative and insensitive. But it wasn't "wrong", it was an example of belief & authority over feeling.

 

[Robed Mystic]

7 minutes ago, Blessed2 said:

 

Yeah, maybe it was a bit too provocative and insensitive. But it wasn't "wrong", it was an example of belief & authority over feeling.

 

So you're still defending it.  Ok.  Pretty sick man.  Weird place to go.  But whatever.  No one forces their views on you.  You take in what you want to take in. If you want to be mind controlled you will allow yourself to be.  You will be weak.  If you do not you won't.   That is assuming you have half a brain, which you do.  So stop the nonsense.

Edited February 26 by Robed Mystic

[Joseph Maynor]

4 minutes ago, Robed Mystic said:

So you're still defending it.  Ok.  Pretty sick man.  Weird place to go.  But whatever.  No one forces their views on you.  You take in what you want to take in. If you want to be mind controlled you will allow yourself to be.  You will be weak.  If you do not you won't.   That is assuming you have half a brain, which you do.  So stop the nonsense.

You're a good guy.  Pleasure to have you around.

Edited February 26 by Joseph Maynor

[Robed Mystic]

6 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

You're a good guy.  Pleasure to have you around.

When the dagger is in you know just how to apply the finishing touch.   I almost feel like Julius Ceasar. " Et  tu Brutus?" 

Edited February 26 by Robed Mystic

[Jonas Long]

For all the claims of personal transcendence and oneness there sure is a lot of being triggered, attempts at self assertion and emotional manipulation, as well as demanding the forum be your personal safe space.

Edited February 26 by Jonas Long

[Blessed2]

19 minutes ago, Robed Mystic said:

Pretty sick man.  Weird place to go.

 

Would anyone else here say that that analogy was sick or over the top or wrong?

I'm asking from anyone who's following this conversation.

 

I dunno, maybe I'm not reading the room / brought up too big of a taboo.

 

I see that it was insensitive and I get that ya'll probably don't want to see that kind of language on this forum so I'm sorry about that.

 

19 minutes ago, Robed Mystic said:

No one forces their views on you.

 

That's what cults say, yet then they also say "I could teach you a lot about reality if you wanted to learn, but you don't."

 

What that's actually saying is, "if you're not believing what I say, it means you don't want to learn the truth."

 

Blatant manipulation.

 

19 minutes ago, Robed Mystic said:

You take in what you want to take in.

 

That's what cults say, and then they also say stuff like:

 

19 minutes ago, Robed Mystic said:

If you want to be mind controlled you will allow yourself to be.  You will be weak.

 

You're saying that I'd be weak, attempting to assert that belief on me so that I'd have to listen to you in order to not be weak.

 

Blatant manipulation.

 

Edited February 26 by Blessed2

[Robed Mystic]

1 minute ago, Jonas Long said:

For all the claims of personal transcendence and oneness there sure is a lot of being triggered, attempts at self assertion and emot. ional manipulation, as well as demanding the forum be your personal safe space.

You would know best about all of that.

[Jonas Long]

2 minutes ago, Robed Mystic said:

You would know best about all of that.

Triggered.

[Jonas Long]

6 minutes ago, Blessed2 said:

 

Would anyone else here say that that analogy was sick or over the top or wrong?

I'm asking from anyone who's following this conversation.

 

I dunno, maybe I'm not reading the room / brought up too big of a taboo.

 

No, especially since said forum(the cult) is fond of saying things like "God loves child rape" and "pedophilia is love" 

Edited February 26 by Jonas Long

[Robed Mystic]

13 minutes ago, Jonas Long said:

No, especially since said forum(the cult) is fond of saying things like "God loves child rape" and "pedophilia is love" 

That's a perversion of the teachings and totally out of line.   God is love and oneness means God must also embrace evil because it is him.  Hei must embrace himself and love and forgive all of himself.  That doesn't mean he condones the doing of evil.   It just means because it must be a part of him he must also love it.  God is not a he of course but I use it here for the sake of the dialogue. 

Edited February 26 by Robed Mystic