Phil

You’re not a / the universe. There is no universe. You’re what’s appearing as the thought, ‘universe’, & perception and sensation. As you are what’s appearing as the so-called universe, there isn’t the separate self of thoughts, the doer. You’re appearing right now only. Thoughts about there being a past, in which you created, are experienced right now only. There is no me which thinks (it’s separate). Thinks is the thought, thinks. There’s no actual experience of thinking or a thinker, which thinks or is thinking. It’s about the same as going to the movies. You never sit at the movies wondering what you’re trying to achieve. The movie is the point. This is already the movie. You forget or overlook your infinitude and unconditionality by being the movie. You are unthinkable and unbelievable because you are appearing as the thoughts. Ineffable being is perfection. There is nothing boring about you, it’s just that for there to be any experience you have to be it. As you be you overlook that you are what’s being. Perfection isn’t bored or boring, it’s just that there’s nothing appearing. It’s a lot like wanting to know if the light in the refrigerator stays on when the door is closed. By all means, create goals, get out of your own way, allow an experience the manifestation. But this in total has no beginning or end, does not know what beginnings and endings are. Might be indicative of overlooking preference appears, and manifestation matches. Yet it is exactly like vacuuming a floor with or without the vacuum plugged in. If you actually believe you don’t like or even something like a family member, friend, job, etc. really anything… You are like a vacuum, which is not plugged in. just going through the motions. Nothing actually changing. In the vein of dummying down as much as possible… If you want shit to change, plug-in first. If you’d like a friendship or a relationship to change in some way, love first. If you want the job, you have to change, or you want a different job, love first. Love your friend or your significant other exactly how they are, sincerely and genuinely. Love the job. You have exactly how it is, sincerely and genuinely. If you’re struggling with that, you’re struggling with appreciation. There is a quick fast easy resolve. Mark one day on your calendar, which will be spent selflessly. Spend the day helping people that could use some help. You will achieve nothing. You will get nothing out of it. You will not gain anything whatsoever. But you will feel the truth. There is no separate self. It’s thoughts. Because you are infinite and indivisible, you can never be anything. Because you are infinite and formless, you can appear as anything. So you go with the only option available, appearing as this and veiling yourself of your own infinitude and unconditionality, and this makes it seem like there is a separate self. If you can figure out some other way I’m all ears. What’s the anxiety about? That is actually happening. That’s why the thoughts feel that way. There is no anxiety in acknowledging the emotions you are already feeling. Combining Bigfoot and unicorn does not make a big foot unicorn. Simply sit in a quiet room. No screens on. No music. Nobody rambling on about anything. Just sit in a room quietly alone. Enjoy the effortlessness of arising preferences. There is no one to tell you what you want. No one is needed for preferences to arise. No. This is a right now only appearance. This is the point. There is no secondary point. Meaning, purpose, value and worth are egocentric beliefs. Ignorance, misidentification. You’re literally the only entity that believes there are separate selves. It’s hysterical. Total innocence, but infinitely funny. You are 100%, absolutely, infinitely and eternally – alone. There is no one else. There is nothing else. But alone is not lonely. Lonely is more stage blue anthropomorphizing (thoughts). Alone is home, perfection, complete, whole, fulfillment, blissful in and of yourself (feeling),

It’s not possible or logical and would require two me’s. Even then, it would just be an opinion, a judgment. There’s a thought about a self which is finite and does not exist, and the guidance of unworthiness, indicating how the thought “I feel unworthy “ feels, as to whether it resonates or not. Unworthy is an adjective. Adjectives describe nouns. Nouns are a person, place or thing. Even if believed you are a person… Who is applying the adjective to you? Who are you applying to? Also, is there an expectation of feeling worthy? To who? In short, it’s how a thought feels not how you feel. So what is the thought?

Totally-crazy!

That’s a belief. There is no negative / second Source of attraction. The discord of the belief is felt, emotional guidance is refused, and the discord is projected as judgment. There are no unsavory characters, only the belief / judgment that there is. Acknowledging the intrinsic guidance (emotions) dispelled & liberates this. It’s within you to lift the forum up.

🤍 What emotion is felt about that? Are you looking back at ten years, or are these thoughts experienced presently? Those two statement are conflicting. Which statement resonates with innocence because it’s honest? Maybe when the emotion is acknowledged in regard to what transpired at that job, the emotion is no longer projected (at the siblings)? I was beat to death. I acknowledged emotions, experienced tremendous relief, self-realized and moved on. Were you ever beat to death?

@WhiteOwl Are there two you’s? Yes or no. One which knows what the other feels like? Yes or no?

Indeed. 🥰 And thought resumes… about how discord isn’t of thoughts. And thought resumes… about an “it” which doesn’t feel like love, and a “knower” which “knows” what love does & doesn’t feel like & that there are “stronger & weaker emotions”. Totally. 🥰 And thought resumes… about a “knower” which “knows” there’s an “it” and “knows” what “it” feels like and “has”. And thought resumes… with a narrative about a “thinker” which “thinks” and a “tryer” which “tries” (over time), which is separate of (in space) what is believed to come to “it”. Absolutely. 🥰 And thought resumes… about a separate self which is scared and has “it” (whatever it is believed to be) and could lose “it”. Writing thoughts out on the backside, and all the ‘subject object’ stuff clicking… the epiphanies, insights, revelations. How’s it feel? How awesome is it using the scale, that it’s there whenever needed… to ‘walk yourself back to yourself’? How’s it feel? Fear being an emotion for example?

@WhiteOwl How many of you are there? You’re implying there are two. One which knows what the other feels like.

@Rose What’s it like when you bring the activity of thought to rest meditatively? How’s it feel? What’s it like… what you write on the dreamboard manifesting, and all the synchronicity therein? How’s it feel? Writing thoughts out on the backside, and all the ‘subject object’ stuff clicking… the epiphanies, insights, revelations. How’s it feel? How awesome is it using the scale, that it’s there whenever needed… to ‘walk yourself back to yourself’? How’s it feel?

Yes. But not to “me”. To Me. But I mean with this… That’s about a person / situation. … “and what I’m really thinkin beyond the scenes about myself is ____________”.

That still includes someone. So, more so, what’s the (discordant) self referential aspect?

Feel… or think / believe… and there is how the thoughts / belief feels? ”I feel I”? 🤔 Two of you?

What’s the self-referential discordant aspect?

Bad?

Meaning & negative are thoughts / beliefs, not things, and are discordant as beliefs because the implication is these are things, and you’re a separate finite self, separate of these “things”. “The knower” that “knows” there is / there are “these things”; meaning and negative. Like unicorn, there are the appearing thoughts ‘meaning’ & ‘negative’, yet ‘meaning’ & ‘negative’ are never actually seen (because they’re beliefs). That the discord felt is “coming from someone, something, or somewhere else” is paranoia, which is the denial that the discord felt is of the thoughts / beliefs. Positivity is nondual. Positive & negative is a dualistic belief. “Our thoughts”, “my thoughts” and “your thoughts” are… thoughts. There’s an experience of appearing thoughts, yet there is no experience of our thoughts, their thoughts, my thoughts or your thoughts. Believing these thoughts, makes it seem like you are a separate self / like there are separate selves. “Possessors” of thoughts. Worry & doubt are felt, and are guidance for thoughts & conscious creating (creating as consciousness, and not as a belief “knower”). The belief in evil is also the ignoring of how thoughts feel (emotions). Paranoia is the mental projection of the discord of beliefs. Harm & violence are actions & behaviors preceded by the discord, denial & projection. There’s nothing more aligned than questioning & investigating what is actual & true. 🤍 I don’t have any. 🤷‍♂️ 😆

👍🏼 Stage blue anthropomorphizing.

According to thoughts. 🙂

What do you figure their motive is? Why would they be spending their time stalking you? How do they know you in the first place?

A belief by default isn’t true. Changing beliefs would be replacing untruth with untruth. On whose behalf are you speaking? As you are present-only & have never experienced not being present, who is the self which has beliefs, which has life, which used to be other than what it presently is…? You are the alternative, yet are without opposite. The underlying presumption is that there is you and understanding / that there is some thing to be understood. Imagine seeking peace & letting go of the seeking and thus there is / this is… peace. Same for understanding. Understanding is synonymous with peace. No difference whatsoever. Neither are experiential. It’s not possible to experience understanding / peace. Akin to changing beliefs being a replacement with new beliefs… attempting to replace misunderstanding with understanding doesn’t pan out. It’s objectifying or thingifying yourself (understanding) as a thought (that there is this thing; understanding). Another example is how attempting to replace impatience with patience doesn’t pan out. It’s because it’s the activity of thought. If impatience is experienced and acknowledged, and the message received, there is no longer the experience of impatience… but it’s not replace by some thing / something experiential called patience… patience is inherent in your eternal nature, only seeming to be obscured by the thought & emotion impatience. Understanding, peace & patience are the sun. Not clouds. Misunderstanding, impatience & the expectation understanding will be experienced are clouds. You’re the unchanging sun. Clouds come & go (appear & disappear).

@Rose How do you continue believing there is a separate material reality consisting of people thinking, motivation, understanding, religions, your old friends, your grandma, a duality of consciousness, etc? Sincere curiosity… given you never experience being born, sleep, death or yourself, how do you continue believing this isn’t you, dreaming?

@Reena 11. 🙂

@Reena Whatever my wife wants.

Why would he feel closer to her than he did to you? When non-existential and non-conceptual, the distinction between pain and suffering is most clarifying & relieving of suffering. That is exactly, precisely what is clarified. It’s the bigger picture, what’s true about you and what’s not which makes sense of everything, including btw all current and future relationships.

That belief would feel discordant to feeling. Like someone saying there are WhiteOwls to WhiteOwl. Discordant describes how a thought, belief or interpretation feels. This discord is of the thought, belief or interpretation. The thought, belief or interpretation is what’s discordant. No. Clarifying & releasing though. Emotion reveals why a thought is / was discordant, thus, fully aware of what it was (a discordant thought, belief or interpretation) and why. One self could know how a second self feels (uncertain / suffering) if there were two of you. Suffering describes how a thought, belief or interpretation feels. This suffering is of the thought, belief or interpretation. A discordant thought, belief or interpretation is what suffering is. The only self there is, is present. So that thought would feel discordant to the self which is present. Worrying vs guidance of worry. The simplest answer is blame’s an emotion not a behavior or action. Feeling blame isn’t really a how, as it’s already the case (per that scenario). There is no ‘re-owning my projections’ as there was / is never a self separate of projection which owned / owns projection. Scenario wise, ‘blaming’ is noticed in hindsight and the discord is acknowledged. That blame is felt (an emotion) can be acknowledged. Emotion is real-time, so as blame is felt and acknowledged… the behavior or action referred to doesn’t occur.

@WhiteOwl Like a movie being watched from the couch, there isn’t anything in the movie. No decisions / deciders.