Jonas Long
-
Posts
4,225 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Jonas Long
-
-
17 minutes ago, Phil said:
This is projection like a movie. But not like a movie in the sense there’s something or someone projecting and something or someone projected upon.
I'd say that's the defining feature of "projection like a movie", so...if it's not projecting like that, why use the term, unless it's more like something else that projects?
-
11 minutes ago, Phil said:
Looking / seeing is projection.
And projecting is imposing separation, or separateness being apparent?
-
5 minutes ago, Phil said:
Yeah. This is it.
What would no longer projecting look like?
-
3 minutes ago, Phil said:
Just by being this / projecting.
Ok...so there is projecting then.
-
40 minutes ago, Phil said:
This is inherently meaningful.
How can any earnest question be not meaningful if "this" is inherently?
-
20 minutes ago, Mandy said:
Re member
In other words what re's with the member if re was never not membered?
-
11 minutes ago, Mandy said:
@Jonas Long no you to re
There's no you to type either, but it seems to happen.
-
3 minutes ago, Mandy said:
Re member
How can you re if there's no separation to begin with?
-
4 minutes ago, Phil said:
This is inherently meaningful.
What exactly makes the last inquiry meaningless? Does projection occur? Can we colloquially disown traits and assume they belong to others?
-
2 minutes ago, Phil said:
That’s meaningless.
Can you say anything meaningful?
-
1 minute ago, Phil said:
Meaning is apparent, if at all.
If I'm projecting so to speak onto other people so to speak, how would I go about re-owning my projections so that I didn't blame shit on other people?
-
24 minutes ago, Phil said:
Separation is an apparent context.
1 hour ago, Phil said:Probably. May be contextual.
So what does it mean that some thing may be contextual?
-
9 minutes ago, Phil said:
Probably. May be contextual.
There are separate contexts?
-
23 minutes ago, Phil said:
No.
Is calling someone a "bum" considered name calling?
-
My clock is so fucked its only right once a day.
-
10 minutes ago, Phil said:
Holy nailed it.
‘All the king’s horses & all the king’s men’ are essentially the emperor's new clothes.
Does a figurative fractioning take place though? Learning about separateness etc.?
-
I was at this show(not recording)
-
(Expletive deleted), we're either talking about something like what the thread offered as a subject or not, we can totally not, but why is my counterpoint the sticking point where its gone too far and we cant actually talk about the proposed subject anyway?
-
1 minute ago, Mandy said:
@Jonas Long I get it, it seems pretty serious when you're a person in a world of people.
Isn't it funny you've been calling out my mistakes as meaningful when you are misreading me, and making mistakes of your own in your responses?
-
Yeah, not evolved enough here to not criticize or call out injustice if I see it...probably never will be, so, lost cause here.
-
3 minutes ago, Mandy said:
Every time anyone publicly criticizes anything, it gets more sales or support. Have you not experienced this? Why engage then, if what you want is the lessening of the dynamic?
Oh, like MLK criticizing the kkk?
-
1 minute ago, Mandy said:
To say anything else to weight money much higher than a loving upbringing.
Pretty sure there's a typo here, though I couldn't say what it is exactly.
-
4 minutes ago, Mandy said:
@Jonas Long Continuing to rehash that narrative is what creates the opportunity. There is no bottom rung of society.
The so-called bottom rung...because it worked out for him, until it didn't. I don't think the "point" I was making is very hard to understand.
-
1 minute ago, Mandy said:
I thought you missed a not in there, but I see you were going for full drama level.
Afraid to not get Dahmered?
Are there not mistakes for you?
Moys to ben
in Expression Journals
Posted
Trump is getting figuratively boned by a guy named Pecker ...what hack is writing reality right now?