Jump to content

Eothasian

Member
  • Posts

    306
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Eothasian

  1. Do you see difference in depth between "Oh, yeah, that's so good, baby. You give a good blowjob." And "I love you so much that I will guard you." ?
  2. Have I somewhere denied the possibility of people liking it? By it I mean hook ups, flings whatever?
  3. That seems contradictory based on yourself. Remember you saying something alike "all my hookups were great". So according to that logic, the amount of flings one has wouldn't matter to determine the joy factor, right? How can you say 'based on my learning process' when you had no learning process on that regard?
  4. Well there's 2 answers here. Ai, for real and I don't know, phil. I don't know.
  5. adding to it really to just enjoy sex without empathic merging is to either be focused on your own sensation during sex || on that of the partner, while there is this big sentience exchange going on between 2 which is deeper than the satisfaction of lust. one has to block it out egoically not to notice that. that's why a lot of narcissistic people, cocaine taking people are able to engage in it so much, it's just fucking your own ego, really. it could be because that's where they allow themselves to be a little bit more selfless. but judging by how they do it, it's unlikely. But it should not be done lightly since that sentience exchange can share you someone's traumas just as it can someone's pleasure.
  6. or sorry. 'don t rely heavily or repeatedly on point towards it through language' is what was conveyed I believe
  7. well as far as I remember this is exactly what he means which wasn't helpful to show that there's only I, in language. but yes, the meaming helpful can be framed and so on. wel ll if you want to show him that, don't point to it directly in language is what he is communicating. source? enlightenment? I?
  8. And it was really bad... Sex without love is not worth it, you guys. I don't know what the point is of that, i feel a little bit like I got raped. No genuine empathic engagement and all, it's all missing. 100% not worth it. Look for a serious relationship. That common emotional engagement is worth more than 90%. I wish I would not have done it. All that pick up talk and that you need sex so you know if you're compatible, total bs. You need deep love for one another. Masturbating is better that this.
  9. I think what he means is that the conceptual pointers towards it don't do effectively for him what is intended by the teachers. it would be better to guide through the experience he has eventually into it
  10. only if they know themselves better than you know yourself or maybe only if they don't know themselves really well
  11. https://youtube.com/channel/UCj07LArq9RBticBUrSsfwQA I wanna add this one
  12. Psychedelics are "Portals" for your mind into unconventional worlds that correlate to "where you are", Sometimes even too seriously dark realities that could kill you or maybe worse. As I did ayahuasca what I experienced on that trip only few have.
  13. I'm fine, don't worry about it. It's better if you turn your gaze towards how you think about someone's vulnerability.
  14. No, not whatever. Public figure or not he is a fkn human. Leo already had problems emotionally engaging with people, all this does is strengthen it.
  15. Guys, when someone shares such a vulnerable experience of his/her life. This is exactly how you don't react. This Thread is unreasonable. Especially its theme. @Lester Retsel Giving him diagnosis like he has "stockholm syndrome" is shit. @Faith Bringing up a subconscious intellectual conflict is autistic af. @Adeptus Psychonautica You guys seriously need to reflect on how you deal with this.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By clicking, I agree to the terms of use, rules, guidelines & to hold Actuality of Being LLC, admin, moderators & all forum members harmless.