Quantum Mechanics

[Phil]

22 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

Yes, quantum mechanics are ideas in play by people

It probably sounds crazy but that is what QM’s stands to dispel. 

[solereproduction]

2 hours ago, Phil said:

It probably sounds crazy but that is what QM’s stands to dispel. 

Compounding chromosomes evolving in series parallel space occupying the moment here in every changing form per addition by molecular combined content erodes away or ancestral displacement of never same reproductions added twice in sequence of inception to conception adapting individually here until dead occupying time until decomposed as departed.

 

No exceptions due to popular opinions by 99% of the population won't accept now is eternity but demand everyone believe in the intellectual conceptualization educated to each generation "Eternal life exceeds mutually evolving when adapting to space uniquely here now.".

 

Everyone is created equally when genetics never duplicates chromosomes combined so far.  Ancestral lineages are self evident by the numbers living 5 generations gaps present here now.

Edited December 16, 2023 by solereproduction

[Blessed2]

@Phil If we take the analogy of a holographic universe... Meaning there's the source of light, the film through which the light shoots and the holographic 'movie' that seems to appear...

 

Are "my thoughts" also a hologram?

 

For example, "the thoughts I had yesterday"... They are not the film, but the illusory hologram "stuff" that's created when the light shoots through the film?

 

The film is not really my thoughts? Rather, there's a pattern on the film, which then seems like in the hologram, as if "my thoughts"?

 

[Phil]

23 minutes ago, Blessed2 said:

@Phil If we take the analogy of a holographic universe... Meaning there's the source of light, the film through which the light shoots and the holographic 'movie' that seems to appear...

 

Are "my thoughts" also a hologram?

Yes.

 

23 minutes ago, Blessed2 said:

For example, "the thoughts I had yesterday"... They are not the film, but the illusory hologram "stuff" that's created when the light shoots through the film?

Yesterday might be on the ‘film’, but yesterday is not actually in the movie. 

 

23 minutes ago, Blessed2 said:

The film is not really my thoughts? Rather, there's a pattern on the film, which then seems like in the hologram, as if "my thoughts"?

Kindness is truth. ‘Pattern’ is a conceptualization of kindness. 

Whatever appears to be which is not in-kind, as in indicative of the true nature, is illusory and or assumed, and not actual. 

A very wise man once said, ‘the ego is that which for whom the truth is too good to be true’. 

A yet wiser man once said, ‘remove the thorn which removed the thorn as well’.

And no one has ever said this is a dream and there’s no such thing as people. 

[solereproduction]

How does quantum mechanics work between these two rhetorical questions;

 

What kind of person is one lifetime defined by people of separate faiths?

 

What kind of people demand each person give up understanding their sole time left adapting as displaced since conceived to replace their DNA donors evolving forward adapting to the same time alive here now?

 

 

 

 

Edited December 17, 2023 by solereproduction
clarifying self displacement as ancestrally inhabiting time now.

[Phil]

@solereproduction

Work out your people stuff. Then you won’t be hung up on it anymore. 

[Blessed2]

On 12/17/2023 at 3:30 PM, Phil said:

Yes.

 

Yesterday might be on the ‘film’, but yesterday is not actually in the movie. 

 

Kindness is truth. ‘Pattern’ is a conceptualization of kindness. 

Whatever appears to be which is not in-kind, as in indicative of the true nature, is illusory and or assumed, and not actual. 

A very wise man once said, ‘the ego is that which for whom the truth is too good to be true’. 

A yet wiser man once said, ‘remove the thorn which removed the thorn as well’.

And no one has ever said this is a dream and there’s no such thing as people. 

 

Hmmm... Are emotions, and/or 'my emotions' also part of the dream and not the truth?

 

The thought that they are still part of the dream and not the truth feels better for some reason. Maybe cause then there's less focus on "how I feel and how I should feel and how this and this feeling is a problem".

 

 

Kind of taking the dream / illusory world analogy seriously for the first time. What if I've actually been just dead wrong? What if this really is like The Matrix or The Truman Show?

 

Edited December 22, 2023 by Blessed2

[Phil]

14 hours ago, Blessed2 said:

 

Hmmm... Are emotions, and/or 'my emotions' also part of the dream and not the truth?

 

The thought that they are still part of the dream and not the truth feels better for some reason. Maybe cause then there's less focus on "how I feel and how I should feel and how this and this feeling is a problem".

 

In accordance with direct experience, there very well might be emotion in regard to QM’s. As evidenced by this thread, apparently the very mention of QM’s is emotionally triggering & seemingly adverse to notions of separation & identity. Yet there is no QM’s triggered in regard to the topic of emotion.

What does the double slit experiment reveal in this regard?

 

14 hours ago, Blessed2 said:

Kind of taking the dream / illusory world analogy seriously for the first time. What if I've actually been just dead wrong? What if this really is like The Matrix or The Truman Show?

 

“Analogy”? 

 

[Enlightened Cat]

I think quantum entanglement is really quite fascinating.

Synchronicities, coincidences, serendipity, etc, could potentially be some sort of quantum entanglement. With our mind and being.

The crazy thing is, I was just thinking of writing this post, and my buddy randomly messaged me on Discord, and all of a sudden mid convo he used "quantum mechanics" as an analogy. Lmao.

[Phil]

@Enlightened Cat

Infinite Yes! ♥️

[Orb]

Ive suddenly in the past few days developed an interest in physics and think its the coolest thing ever. You guys know any good books on this? Science is cool.

[Phil]

That truth is uncovered via unfettering is all-pervasive, and QM’s is unexceptional. 

 

Just like an atom unfettered of an electron is said to then have a positive charge, dispelling an obscuring belief un-obscures the true nature.

 

An atom doesn’t become positive or gain a new property any more than a sep self does. The true nature, pure positivity, is simply un-obscured & unfettered. 

 

A ‘positively charged atom’ is said to be an ion.

“I on” - being tapped in & turned on - plugging the vacuum in and then - conscious creating. 

 

Adam: Represents the direct appearance or creation of the world-sphere in biblical terms.

Atom: Represents the direct appearance or manifestation of the world-sphere in scientific terms.

 

I on, ion. One & the same apparently. 

 

Psychosomatics can be seen clearly as a revealing or restoring of the true nature as well-being, by removing obscurations or believed limitations. Just as unfettering the true nature of an atom or consciousness uncovers its inherent nature, psychosomatic ‘seeing’ clears away mental and emotional blocks to reveal and align with nature or, well-being.

[Someone here]

@Phil how did you get to this point ? Did you read any books ? What kinds of psychedelics you've experimented with ? Ever seen a spiritual guru when you were a seeker before your awakening or whatever? 

there is a fine line between brilliance ,eloquence, creativity,..etc and nonsensical gibberish. Not judging your post above as this or that . But its a mix of the two ✌. 

[Phil]

6 minutes ago, Someone here said:

@Phil how did you get to this point ?

I’ve never actually moved. I just make it seem like it to myself, as myself. Quite magical frankly. 

 

6 minutes ago, Someone here said:

Did you read any books ? What kinds of psychedelics you've experimented with ? Ever seen a spiritual guru when you were a seeker before your awakening or whatever? 

Such as “in a past”?

 

6 minutes ago, Someone here said:

there is a fine line between brilliance ,eloquence, creativity,..etc and nonsensical gibberish. Not judging your post above as this or that . But its a mix of the two ✌. 

Brilliance, eloquence and creativity are real as these aspects describe my nature. Nonsensical gibberish is as illusory as judgement. Nonduality just means not two. 

[Someone here]

31 minutes ago, Phil said:

Such as “in a past”

Yes sure .I'm interested to hear a bit about your background. 

[Phil]

@Someone here

Background as in what thoughts appear presently? 

[Someone here]

4 hours ago, Phil said:

@Someone here

Background as in what thoughts appear presently? 

No.

[Mandy]

@Someone here Fascinating how pride and shame are two sides of the same coin, isn't it? 

[Someone here]

5 minutes ago, Mandy said:

@Someone here Fascinating how pride and shame are two sides of the same coin, isn't it? 

I don't know what does that mean or what exactly are you alluding to .

[Mandy]

@Someone here It's a strong theme in most of your posts, no matter who the subject seems to be, including yourself. 

5 hours ago, Someone here said:

 

there is a fine line between brilliance ,eloquence, creativity,..etc and nonsensical gibberish. Not judging your post above as this or that . But its a mix of the two ✌.