The Vibration Paradigm

[Phil]

7 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

When you going to express what one is and isn't rather than has or doesn't have.

I don’t have time. 

[solereproduction]

17 hours ago, Phil said:

I don’t have time. 

Only time anyone or anything has is occupying space here changing form shaped since arrival. Eroding or growing until dead and decomposition reverse the process since arrival.

 

Evolving forward isn't a theory as one at time sequence of events done so far.  Past ends here, future only developing forward now as a whole universal moment been everything going on now.

Edited April 20, 2023 by solereproduction

[Phil]

18 hours ago, solereproduction said:

When you going to express what one is and isn't rather than has or doesn't have

A concept doesn’t have a concept though. That would be another concept. 

1 hour ago, solereproduction said:

Only time anyone or anything has is occupying space here changing form shaped since arrival. Eroding or growing until dead and decomposition reverse the process since arrival.

 

Evolving forward isn't a theory as one at time sequence of events done so far.  Past ends here, future only developing forward now as a whole universal moment been everything going on now.

I don’t have time. Concept doesn’t have concept. Concept can not have or occupy, have & occupy are concepts. Concept is vibrational appearance. Past doesn’t end, concept appears, or doesn’t. Same for future. Same for developing. Same for change. 

[solereproduction]

1 hour ago, Phil said:

A concept doesn’t have a concept though. That would be another concept. 

Concepts are intellectual creations, a though is comparing created concepts beyond actual time evolving forward here as historically used to date among ancestors changing population currently present separated by generation gaps remaining as the whole species in this atmosphere

 

1 hour ago, Phil said:

I don’t have time. Concept doesn’t have concept. Concept can not have or occupy, have & occupy are concepts. Concept is vibrational appearance. Past doesn’t end, concept appears, or doesn’t. Same for future. Same for developing. Same for change. 

Dividing the whole situation of genetic evolving taking place as a species working in series parallel space spontaneously here simultaneously now never the same total sum again is an exponential whole equal to existential ideas cherry picking specific details never duplicated again.

 

Your context is wrapped within relative time logistics(concepts recited constantly persuading everyone to ignore sense of proportionately here), not actual kinetic evolving taking place but bringing potential possibilities into social fruition as a society created 24/7 logistics that omit everything but the selected details taken out of content never same results twice.

 

Nobody can explain eternal separation grammatically punctuated to create a single timeline of each product of reproduction's presence in series parallel evolving situation.

 

Rational ideas create reationalized outcomes that don't stay in sequence with mutually timed apart here.

It always creates conflicting narratives between separate sides of thinking outside living self contained to one's ancestral displacement.

[Phil]

20 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

Concepts are intellectual creations,

Is that a concept (about concepts)?

 

20 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

a though is comparing created concepts beyond actual time evolving forward here as historically used to date among ancestors changing population currently present separated by generation gaps remaining as the whole species in this atmosphere

Is that a thought (about thought)?

[solereproduction]

20 hours ago, Phil said:

I don’t have time. 

You won't take the time you have to consider things differently than you were trained to believe nobody knows how evolving happens in real time one only is evolving forward now.  The whole species is working the same way as the whole food chain native to this atmosphere mutually timed apart as rest of the universe perpetually balancing out new total sums present until cycles go away or arriving to replace.

[Phil]

@solereproduction

It’s not that I won’t take time, it’s that I can’t take time. 

It’s not that I was trained, it’s that I can’t be trained. 

I does know about the whole species though. 

 

[solereproduction]

19 minutes ago, Phil said:

Is that a concept (about concepts)?

it was an understanding what times apart conceptions comparing concepts of what if evolving is more than genetically eternally separated reproductions left alive now

 

21 minutes ago, Phil said:

Is that a thought (about thought)?

always comparing realities against one another is best way to keep all generation gap results avoiding navigating life evolving as one of a kind now ancestrally eternally separated here until the end of arriving 5th generation gap replacing previous 4.

[solereproduction]

Just now, Phil said:

@solereproduction

It’s not that I won’t take time, it’s that I can’t take time. 

It’s not that I was trained, it’s that I can’t be trained. 

I does know about the whole species though. 

 

Too busy believing anything else is possible.

 

Hell being torn apart like that instinctively aware intellectual minds are corrupting everyone alive added to the moment and nothing you do stops it. Better to play a role than get eliminated from the game of life destroying your own species inside out.

[Phil]

1 minute ago, solereproduction said:

it was an understanding what times apart conceptions comparing concepts of what if evolving is more than genetically eternally separated reproductions left alive now

What was an understanding? 

 

1 minute ago, solereproduction said:

 

always comparing realities against one another is best way to keep all generation gap results avoiding navigating life evolving as one of a kind now ancestrally eternally separated here until the end of arriving 5th generation gap replacing previous 4.

How many realities are there (to compare)?

[Phil]

Just now, solereproduction said:

Too busy believing anything else is possible.

 

Hell being torn apart like that instinctively aware intellectual minds are corrupting everyone alive added to the moment and nothing you do stops it. Better to play a role than get eliminated from the game of life destroying your own species inside out.

Who is being said to be believing? 

Who’s doing / trying to stop and what is it that’s to be stopped? 

Who’s playing a role?

 

[solereproduction]

13 minutes ago, Phil said:

What was an understanding? 

My brain navigating space as one of a kind mutually evolving forward same as anyone else staying in character of their projected ideology life exceeds mutually evolving now.

 

14 minutes ago, Phil said:

How many realities are there (to compare)?

estimated 8 billion ancestors claiming life is too difficult to know living as governed to believe now isn't eternity.

 

13 minutes ago, Phil said:

Who is being said to be believing? 

 

Who is opinion based by consensus of other ancestors staying in character about another sole displacement not participating in imagining life outside their own skin.

16 minutes ago, Phil said:

Who’s doing / trying to stop and what is it that’s to be stopped? 

Chain of command protecting reasonable doubt sustaining power of suggestion given to those promising better tomorrows than genetics maintains eternally separated now.

 

18 minutes ago, Phil said:

Who’s playing a role?

Every person defending race, creed color, national origin, gender bias, context over content, symbolism over substance, mind over matter, character matters and characteristics are what define who's who forward here.

 

Ancestry playing type cast people defend the stereotyping done ancestrally to this point of evolution achieved in 400 generation gaps to the last 5 here now.

 

Every ancestor has the time to change their mind now, not after dead protecting humanity. Being eternally separated here is a constant second chance to get back to navigating time occupying space mutually evolving forward now.

 

that equality vs equity masquerade done throughout history capitalizing off reasonable doubt used against each reproduction lived and alive.

 

the vibrations of conflicting interpretations is the mayhem, madness, misery sustained promising better tomorrows than genetics delivers lifetimes left here now repeating the same mantras done hundred generations and more.

[Phil]

Who’s brain?

 

So there’s 8 billion realities?

 

Who’s opinion is ‘who is opinion’?

 

Chain of commands is a who which id doing?

 

If a person is playing a role, what’s a person?

[solereproduction]

7 minutes ago, Phil said:

Who’s brain?

 

Each ancestor has a unique brain same as fingerprints and DNA.  Whom is specific ancestor who is relative to social consensus of a person playing a typecast role model serving ideology forward here.

 

14 minutes ago, Phil said:

So there’s 8 billion realities?

give or take what each ancestor chooses to believe and interpret living beyond eternally separated now.

 

15 minutes ago, Phil said:

Who’s opinion is ‘who is opinion’?

gendered ancestor using context to describe their social position in society is more important than understanding natural survival of oneself, one's ancestry, ones species, one's environment relative to series parallel position in the atmosphere as alive since conceived to replace previous 4 generation gap direct linked DNA donors

 

18 minutes ago, Phil said:

If a person is playing a role, what’s a person?

a career denier of oneself's reason to be alive.  Simple replacement of their previous ancestry. That equality thing.

[Phil]

@solereproduction

Maybe another way to phrase is, what is the ultimate reality / actuality of a brain?

 

So how many realities there are is based on belief?

 

Put another way, what is ‘opinion’?

 

19 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

40 minutes ago, Phil said:

If a person is playing a role, what’s a person?

a career denier of oneself's reason to be alive.  Simple replacement of their previous ancestry. That equality thing.

What is a career denier of oneself’s reason to be alive?

[solereproduction]

10 minutes ago, Phil said:

Maybe another way to phrase is, what is the ultimate reality / actuality of a brain?

There is no ultimate reality, just actual life evolving existing as changing total sum forward now. 

 

11 minutes ago, Phil said:

So how many realities there are is based on belief?

and behavior of the faithful choosing to ignore natural time as specifically limited to evolving forward now. Everyone else does it too justification for not standing against humanity.

 

13 minutes ago, Phil said:

Put another way, what is ‘opinion’?

Consensus of ancestries and people agreeing to disagree how evolving is limited to adapting in the moment here.

 

15 minutes ago, Phil said:

What is a career denier of oneself’s reason to be alive?

Who one defines themselves contextually more than simply reproductively here. Character role playing ancestor adapting to the shared moment genetics eternally separates lifetime like snowflakes never the same twice. From molecular water  being humidity, dew, frost, rain, hail, snow to ancestral reproductions as a food chain native to this atmosphere. Inception to extinction doesn't matter species lived 1 generation or 1,000's.

[Phil]

14 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

There is no ultimate reality, just actual life evolving existing as changing total sum forward now. 

Is it possible that ‘actual life evolving existing as changing total sum forward now’, the words and whatever the words might be said to point to, is actually an appearance, and therein is not actually ‘actual life evolving existing as changing total sum forward now’, but is whatever is appearing as?

 

Rather than what’s being referred to as three cups no peanut, perhaps a reply could begin with yes that’s possible… or no, that is not possible…

 

14 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

34 minutes ago, Phil said:

So how many realities there are is based on belief?

and behavior of the faithful choosing to ignore natural time as specifically limited to evolving forward now. Everyone else does it too justification for not standing against humanity.

If how many realities there are is based on belief, then when it is said there are 8 billion realities, that is based on belief.

 

14 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

34 minutes ago, Phil said:

Put another way, what is ‘opinion’?

Consensus of ancestries and people agreeing to disagree how evolving is limited to adapting in the moment here.

How does an opinion require consensus? 

For example, having played a few, the preference of guitars is that of Taylor (brand). 

Is there a consensus?

 

14 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

34 minutes ago, Phil said:

What is a career denier of oneself’s reason to be alive?

Who one defines themselves contextually more than simply reproductively here. Character role playing ancestor adapting to the shared moment genetics eternally separates lifetime like snowflakes never the same twice. From molecular water  being humidity, dew, frost, rain, hail, snow to ancestral reproductions as a food chain native to this atmosphere. Inception to extinction doesn't matter species lived 1 generation or 1,000's.

What is who one defines themselves reproductively here? 

Re productivity here seems like opinion. 

 

 

 

[solereproduction]

11 minutes ago, Phil said:

Is it possible that ‘actual life evolving existing as changing total sum forward now’, the words and whatever the words might be said to point to, is actually an appearance, and therein is not actually ‘actual life evolving existing as changing total sum forward now’, but is whatever is appearing as?

 

Rather than what’s being referred to as three cups no peanut, perhaps a reply could begin with yes that’s possible… or no, that is not possible…

 

If how many realities there are is based on belief, then when it is said there are 8 billion realities, that is based on belief.

 

How does an opinion require consensus? 

For example, having played a few, the preference of guitars is that of Taylor (brand). 

Is there a consensus?

 

What is who one defines themselves reproductively here? 

Re productivity here seems like opinion. 

 

 

 

Passive aggression is always hiding behind polite condescension intellectual minds excel distracting ancestral brains navigating their personal time adapting to the moment here equally occupying space.

 

 

[Mandy]

4 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

Passive aggression is always hiding behind polite condescension intellectual minds excel distracting ancestral brains navigating their personal time adapting to the moment here equally occupying space.

 

 

Can you think here or now? Can you explain here or now? 

[Phil]

1 hour ago, solereproduction said:

Passive aggression is always hiding behind polite condescension intellectual minds excel distracting ancestral brains navigating their personal time adapting to the moment here equally occupying space.

But is it possible?