Jane

The illusion can never be free of itself either. How can an illusion free an illusion, become liberated? It can’t.

What’s even more interesting is that “nothingness” can never not exist. 🤯 Lol

There’s actually no such thing as thoughts, they simply don’t exist.

Maybe, but then every thread in the Nondual sections of this site, are going to be paradoxical, so this might as well stay put, and save the pointless effort of migrating.

A nondualist has no choice but to play two roles in life: why, because there’s no such thing as a non dualist 🤣 There is only a dualist which can never not be a dualist. 🫢😉

👍👏

That’s right because when just one thing is known; everything is known, because everything is one. 🫶

Two black eyes 💀

Exactly! Sense does not make sense ..sense is senseless.

Beneath the bottom line is where Heaven is…perhaps? 🤔 Heavens above!! 🫢

Nothing about what the Bible, Religion,God and Jesus or Leo spoke about makes any sense. When Leo claims “You are God” But Jesus claimed that God was his Father, does that mean Jane is a Father 😬🤔?

😬 There’s no thing being the mirror. I appear to be a paradox that never is/ was. 🤫

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Leo_Gura Leo is God 🤣 God is Dead - Nietzsche Nietzsche is Dead - God

Ok great. 👍 Will keep an eye open for it. 🙏 Thanks.

The I that has never seen a thought; has never been seen either. As these concepts are known never seen. Seeing never sees itself in the same context the sun never shines on itself. The only answer to the question is already contained in the question...a thought is nought but a thought, conceptually known, and never seen.

Therefore knowledge can only point to the illusory nature of reality; the realisation by no one that there is no known knower, except as “thought” thinks so. What attends to “thought” what answers it, what identifies with it? The answer is more thought. Thoughts about thoughts will eventually reveal to themselves that given no attention they will literally cease to exist. If we let a thought be nothing, then that's what it will be ... nothing.

The apparent seeker sees nothing in what is sought, because the sought can know nothing of its reality. So there is never any paradox in reality. “SEEKER” is just another empty principle appearing real in this conception.

My view is that there is nothing beyond the dream of love bliss and ecstasy. In other words the dream is all there is, that can be known. And yet at the same time; what is known can know nothing. So maybe the purpose of the dream is for the dream character to go beyond the dream to the actuality that nothing ever happened or happens in a dream. This is just my opinion though, as I view reality through the lens of my perception here.

Very well said! 👍 The subject/object duality is within the illusory dream of separation where there is none. The ''I AM'' is the direct experience of empty space between the fullness of thought. Here; there is no middle man.

Illusions. An illusion knowing it's illusory. 🤣

Yes, because anything said is basically just sound heard as words. Quite remarkable really, this illusion. Sound, where is that? 🤔

👍

@Orbran Hello!

No body thinks this.

No body knows.