Adeptus Psychonautica

@Robed Mystic Seriously??? Even the emails that you sent had errors in them, so if thats the yardstick by which you want this to be defined, then let’s consider it a fairly halfwitted own goal 🙂 I mean first of all, it really shows how desperate you are for attention that you are emailing me to look at THIS. It’s clearly something you are very proud of, but its like taking pride in having done a really big poo on the floor. Secondly the fact that you couldnt even get your email right… TWICE, kinda undermines your whole argument. Email 1: “For back onto the” Email 2: “Go back on for” …and lets overlook the various abuses of punctuation and use of colloquial terms. Yeah… its not exactly your best work mate, but it is entirely representative of your “output”. You know, I didn’t make a point of your atrocious spelling and grammar throughout this thread because it was pale in comparison to the rich density of blustery, buffoonery, poor comprehension, incoherence, lies, and delusion. I also fully appreciate that typing on small devices can occasionally cause errors, it happens. It certainly happens to me so I wouldnt want to be a petty hypocrite… nudge nudge… wink wink 😉 Still if thats the criteria by which you want myself and others to judge you by, then thats fine - consider yourself based upon this email example to be an utter failure. King takes himself in a cringeworthy act of attention seeking - self checkmate 👍

It actually makes complete sense, but granted it requires a bit of nuance and cultural experience to grasp. I'm more than happy to break it down for you 🙂 "Yours by the looks of it. Ego bruised, mind broken, in a place where the only way can save face is today invent tall tales. Surely you aren’t a massive fucking mard arse as well?" The yours refers to you. Ego bruised and mind broken refers to your manifested behaviour in this thread, that of a someone who is irrational and is incapable of cohesive thought. Tall Tales is a colloquialism for bullshit, here is a link to the definition - https://www.dictionary.com/browse/tall-tale#:~:text=An exaggerated%2C unreliable story%3A “,another of his tall tales.” Massive fucking mard arse is northern English slang for someone who is a having a sulky tantrum. Here is a link to the definition - https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=mard "come and ave a go if you think your hard enough" is a chant commonly used at football games as a challenge to the opposition. I guess the american version would be something like "come at me bro". Its a pretty well known meme, even outside Europe and has featured in Hollywood movies so its not that obscure https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/20852f32-8aa4-4308-936c-2c09fadb4fc6 I hope that clarifies everything for you. So you see, it makes sense - you just didn't understand the cultural references, which is fine, but I don't think its THAT difficult to infer the meaning... for most people I mean. Now... if that is IT, that is your prime example of "me UNRAVELLING", then I don't think you know what unravelling means. Honestly I don't think you know what anything means, but no need to dig all that up again. See this is your problem, you fantasize things into what you want them to be, but its never even close to what actually happened in reality. The reality is that there was no unravelling from my side, but there is an ongoing one from your side, and the result is that practically everything you have written here is complete fantasy bullshit. Its pure delusion. Its kinda beautiful that all this occurred after I proposed that Actualized corrodes rationality and reason, and then you popped up - what a gift from the universe to illustrate my point 😍

I mean the very easily recognizable insecurities you cannot help but display. In particular the ones around your intellect. Can you point us to a source of this unraveling you mention? I don’t think you can 😀 We have at least two guys like Leo, him and you, and no doubt many more over on Actualized.

I think in the case of @Robed Mystic then drugs might help with his insecurities, particularly if they are rooted in trauma. The academic research is very promising.

@Robed Mystic you should probably consider that given your earlier delusional performance about how you had “swiftly dealt with me” then you look like a massive hypocrite right now. I absolutely am indeed looking to demonstrate to anyone reading this that you are delusional and a liar, I have made no secret about that, and I agree it certainly is comical. Don’t worry about the time I invest, I think characters like you and Leo are well worth my efforts, and threads like this can be linked to and used as examples, so its all good. It really is fascinating how you subconsciously incorporate what people say into your comebacks. I say bully, you say bully, I say mate, you say mate, I say prove my point, you say prove my point - you are really suggestible! Honestly though I think I have nailed this for the moment, and really all you are doing now is recycling the same inane ramblings. I know that in your head you think this has been a win for you, and thats fine because you’re delusional. I doubt anyone else reading this shares your strange perspective of how this has played out, so yeah I’m really happy 😊 I do now see that you did in fact reply earlier to my offer, so apologies for that and its no surprise that you wouldn’t want to have that discussion for fairly obvious reasons. On a serious note though it is somewhat sad. I genuinely wonder what has made you this way and the lack of opportunities that has prevented you from resolving your obvious insecurities. I can only guess that this is the result of some kind of trauma from your earlier life which you need to work on, because you seem consumed by it. Although doing spiritual work on your own might be the easier option, in terms of vulnerability, its not actually working for you in my opinion, so I would advise investigating a guided practice that can help you work on your traumas. An ayahuasca retreat can work wonders if you can find the courage to step out of your comfort zone.

@Robed Mystic Its great that you don’t feel embarrassed, but you SHOULD feel embarrassed. Thats the usual reaction to someone having their bullshit publicly dismantled, but again this just proves my point that you are indeed delusional, and that your reasoning and rationality has possibly been corroded by the toxic culture of Actualized. So are you gonna have this online debate with me to demonstrate your superior intellect? You keep dodging the question 🐔🐔🐔

@Robed Mystic Yeah… but none of what you think happened actually happened. There is a written record so just blustering that “I OWNED YOU LOL” doesnt change the reality that you didn’t - it just bolsters my argument that you are delusional, which you clearly are 🙂 You are a liar, you are delusional, and you are not even very good at these things. You are a coward who is full of hot air and bullshit and I am having a fucking blast dismantling you, and unlike you I have evidence to back up everything I say - where is yours?

I would pretty much agree. I don’t follow politics much and don’t have a stake in the US, so my opinions are purely from the outside as a casual observer. I tend to think of Biden as well meaning but incompetent, and showing clear signs of bumbling associated with old age - nothing wrong with that, and I can only hope I make it that far with still something in the gas tank. Trump on the other hand is a buffoon who is full of hot air, emotionally fragile, petty, unintelligent, and has been demonstrated to be a pathological liar. That he was ever given a position of authority is a black mark on US history. In short I think Biden is incompetent, Trump is a liar, and I will leave it to you to spot the similarities to the person we are discussing.

There is much more conversation just from today, of which the argument you singled out was just a tiny slice. Put together with the rest of his posts and there is quite a body of content upon which conclusions can be drawn. This is the first post he makes which I actually define as delusional, and as you can see we are already far into the dialogue, again which dismisses as factually incorrect your previous claim that I simply brand anything I disagree with as delusional. Here is the part which demonstrates delusion as there is nothing in the entire record of conversation that matches what he describes ” I, however, quickly showed him that perhaps he has been getting ahead of his boots. This normally leads to one falling and scraping their knees, which he so nicely did - in front of everyone. I never insulted his intelligence or his ability to understand basic language- which is the depths he has to go to, because there ain't much ammo in the pack.” Clearly he thinks something has happened which was effectively ended this argument in his favour, a “flawless victory” if you will, upon which he is not only convinced that this occurred as a real event, but is actually gloating on the swiftness and expertise with which he executed it. … but the reality is it never happened. There is no post within this entire conversation which even vaguely resembles such a knock out blow. Its complete bullshit 🙂 In fact, every post prior by him had been thoroughly dismantled into the collection of poor comprehension, basic misunderstandings, and blustering that they clearly are. I even asked him to provide a source link to where he thinks this occurred, he didn’t. This is Donald Trump levels of dishonest buffoonery. He continues fleshing out this non-event in a later post, doubling down on his precision takedown narrative with this… ”It's OK. Sometimes the schoolyard bullies need to be brought down a notch.” He is clearly demonstrating a belief that something happened which has defined him as the victor beyond any doubt, and that I am stunned into silence and left tending to my wounds. The only problem is thats its a total fantasy, none of this happened, and we have a complete record of the actual conversation which we can interrogate to find the truth. The truth is that EVERY post he made up until that point was filled with misinformation, basic misunderstandings of the terminology being used, incoherent arguments, and major flaws in basic comprehension. All this was plainly explained to him just as this is being explained to you, and I think its fairly obvious that, just as @Lester Retsel also identified, he was getting VERY emotionally triggered that his intellect was being challenged - clearly this is a very sore spot for him. Perhaps you can fill in the blanks Devin? Can you identify the section in the conversation to which he has clearly earned this stunning victory to which he refers? The moment that he “quickly showed me” where i “scraped my knee in front of everyone” - can anyone here identify this moment to which he boasts? No, it never happened. The guy is acting upon a fantasy, he is delusional. Furthermore its worth pointing out that his latter statement that… “I never insulted his intelligence or his ability to understand basic language- which is the depths he has to go to, because there ain't much ammo in the pack.” … is an outright lie. Now just to be clear I have zero problem with him insulting my intelligence, It’s actually funny that he would go this route when he clearly lacks the necessary toolset. But for him to use a statement like this which is demonstrably FALSE as a way to appear virtuous is truly putrid. The guy is not right in the head. Here are the quotes… ”The fact that your feeble mind has put the two together is mind boggling.” ”When I actually attempt to expend any mental energy on having a conversation with you, it gets really messy for you very quickly. I suggest you go back to the drawing board before you attempt to hold a dialogue with me” ”if you actually went back and watched the metaphysical episodes - which actually takes comprehension - something with you i have serious doubts about. But I shouldn't be surprised- your mind lacks the comprehension to even grasp the difference between relative and Absolute” This is the guy who bold faced claimed he NEVER insulted my intelligence, and that my doing so is a depth I have to sink to . Is he delusional or is he simply a pathological liar? Again given the context that this guy cannot string a basic argument together without it being peppered with elementary levels of comprehension mistakes, then this level of smugnorance is comical 😀 So as I have demonstrated he is a fantasist and a liar. From that we can either conclude that he is deliberately being dishonest and trying to gaslight, or that he cannot help but do it because he is delusional and genuinely believes he is telling the truth. I would prefer to give him the benefit of the doubt and suggest the latter. I hope that helps clarify things Devin.

Oh I think you understand it just fine, but rather are deflecting the question by trying that suggestible mimicry that @Lester Retsel highlighted earlier. I think I will do a post on this phenomenon later on so I can document your various character flips, its quite fascinating. Anyway I’ll try and put the previous post in even simpler terms for you, to help with your comprehension. Do you want to have this debate in real time with me, or are you too much of a massive blustering coward? You said earlier you COULD easily handle YouTube, lets put that claim to the test. I’m offering you a platform, an audience, and a chance for you to dismantle me with the unique intellect you have demonstrated today (🤣) What say you?

Yours by the looks of it. Ego bruised, mind broken, in a place where the only way can save face is today invent tall tales. Surely you aren’t a massive fucking mard arse as well? come and ave a go you if you think your hard enough

I actually think the opposite is true, and I have demonstrated why. The actual sentence was "I cannot "screenshot" the corrosion of someone losing their grip on rational thought" So no, not SNAPSHOT, and not REALITY. This is important because words have meanings, and you get very confused easily This was in response to you asking for a screenshot of something you thought was being referred to on the Actualized forum, which in itself was a misunderstanding of the conversation, because that was not what was being referenced. The topic at hand was RATIONALITY not REALITY, so no I would not call someone who was losing their grip on rationality as someone who is suffering psychosis, that is an absurd conflation - probably by someone who doesn't know what any of these words mean. You see rationality doesn't mean "sane", thus suggesting that irrational equals "insane" or psychotic. I can only suggest that you spend some time to look what these words mean before you try and deploy them in meaningful conversation, because you are making a dogs dinner of it. Also just make the effort to actually read the events you are referencing from mere hours ago, doing so will prevent these silly errors. Yes you did, among many others. I will grant this is one of the less egregious ones but it is part of the overall picture of how skewed your sense of reality is, and lets not forget there was actually more to this scenario. Again I will do the heavy lifting for you with a quick reality recap and by providing the actual quote, but of yourse you could do this for yourself. 1. First you made the claim that I deem myself a rationalist - this wasn't correct. You made it up 2. Second you made the claim that I stated I do not label myself - this was not correct. You made it up 3. Third you made the claim that I had a major issue with the use of labels - this was not correct. I will grant that I mentioned it in this line below, but I think to view this as something that was overly critical would be a misreading 4. Based on the second claim you argued that there was a double standard at play - there wasn't Here is the actual line, its more of a criticism of that fact that your labels are made up bullshit rather than the labelling itself, but I get that context isn't your strong point. "Now YOU might deem me to be a rationalist, but I think that's just because you seem to obsess over what labels you can assign to people - Person X is enlightened, person Y is awakened, person Z is materialist (that was something you previously declared me as, please make your mind up)" I honestly don't know what to say to you. I think I have made a solid case that you have spent the day talking out of your arse, and getting very confused and overemotional in the process. I'm happy that you have found solace in Devins support, but I'm not sure anyone else reading this would agree with you, and Im not sure even Devin does entirely. Anyway back to my offer about a live battle of wits for all to see? Are you up to the challenge of taking down my "feeble mind" for the world to see ? I think we both know the answer from you, but the offer is genuine. Do you accept my challenge? 😀

I never said that you are calling me to delusional. If you can find an example of me stating a fantasy as absolute fact, and then reacting it it in a way which indicates I completely believe this fantasy is objective fact, and then referring back to it on multiple occasions even when it has been debunked as fantasy, then I think it would be fair to call that delusional. What I have stated here, and the context within which I have used it is completely in line with the dictionary definition of the word. I have made detailed descriptions of delusional behaviour and it matches this definition. So yes I know the definition of the word, and if you wish to provide evidence to the contrary then feel free. Here is that definition again Delusional "characterized by or holding idiosyncratic beliefs or impressions that are contradicted by reality or rational argument" That's not correct. Firstly I am not providing a psychiatric diagnosis, I am describing a behaviour based upon text based conversation here in this thread. The fact of the existence of that text based conversation is itself an object within reality, and if one person is fantasizing events that did not happen within that written record, to such a scale that it falls outside of the bounds of error or confusion, then delusion is a reasonable assessment. Its got nothing to do with being wrong, he is acting upon fantasy. Granted he is also acting upon poor comprehension, and emotional impulse, and those were called out accordingly. Both you and he have made delusional statements within this thread, and to describe them as such is entirely accurate. Delusion does not require belief in miracles such as turning water into wine, the delusion can be fairly mundane. If I state a sincere belief that the largest landmass in the world is the UK, and refuse to change that belief in the face of reality, then that would be delusional. No biblical miracles necessary. Again, this indicates that it is you who does not fully comprehend the meaning of this word. Thats not accurate. I have called out each event for what it is - poor comprehension, confusion, misunderstanding, lack of knowledge. You imply that every disagreement is met with a blanket answer, but again we have a record of events - go read it. I hope this clarifies things for you Devin, but I'm happy to keep working through it with you if you remain confused.

I already recapped this situation in an earlier post which you can find here. He completely invented a scenario which did not occurr, and even when faced with the text record of those events NOT HAPPENING, he still acts as if they did. Further to that he now believes that not only did that happen, but that he was gloriously triumphant in teaching me a well earned lesson due to his cunning intellect. None of this correlates with reality. We have a solid text based record of events and it looks nothing like what he thinks it does. That is delusional. Now when he makes mistakes with comprehension or misuse of a word I do not state that as delusion, I call them for what they are. So you can rest assured that when I use the word delusional then I mean delusional, and I am happy to pair it up to each specific fabrication if you wish, but honestly I think they are all fairly obvious. In your own case then your beliefs around Leo’s reach, size, and greatness are indeed delusional because they do not correlate with reality. You seem to acknowledge this now and are somewhat backtracking, if that is the case then kudos to you - and I mean that with complete sincerity.

Im using it per its dictionary definition to describe a behavior which does not match observable reality. Thats literally what the word means. Delusional “characterized by or holding idiosyncratic beliefs or impressions that are contradicted by reality or rational argument” So no, neither Ignorant nor Bias would be appropriate words in this context, and if you believe they are then you are mistaken. As the saying goes “The dictionary is your friend” 🙂

Im guessing he recently watched The Queens Gambit on Netflix and has imprinted on himself that he is a chess prodigy. ”Knight takes queen” im dying of cringe 🤣

You do indeed have a shtick. Your shtick is that you fantasize things which did not happen, and act as if they did. Again though I don’t think you even know what “Shtick” means. Case in point - I never criticized you for labeling me, not did I ever state that labeling people is something I don’t do, and the written evidence is here in this thread. But you have fantasized a completely different scenario, and you do it so frequently that I am labeling it “your shtick”. This is delusional behaviour.

English is his first language. I have spoken to him in person on a Skype call, he is an average westerner in that regard, so we will to look for other explanations for the confusing dialogue.

I did, glad you picked up on it. I was going to mention it but I didn’t want to seem like I was going too far into diagnosing him. If we backtrack through the thread then as soon as I mention something like him being a bully, he immediately incorporates it into his shtick. I think it shows how suggestible he is which certainly explains his attraction to Actualized.

Seriously where do you think this happened? 😀 Please post a link to what you are referring to. I want to try and understand the process which leads you to these absurd conclusions

Again, you are completely misunderstanding what has been said. I never mentioned psychosis from psychedelics in relation to this argument around "corrosion", and I already explained AT LENGTH not only what I meant by that, the source of it, and why I think that - and it had nothing to do with psychosis from psychedelics. It literally happened RIGHT HERE IN THIS THREAD JUST A FEW PAGES AGO. I even you used you as an example, and we know you don't take psychedelics - seriously where are you pulling this psychosis thing from? Have you even been present for this exchange we have had today? Never mind, allow me to recap it for you. Look, here is the post from earlier today explaining "corrosion of rationality", go read it - Now, that you adorn this with statements like "Nice try. But here you fall flat on your face." and "This was an easy one. Knight captures queen." and lets not forget "The fact that your feeble mind has put the two together is mind boggling" in response to something you have ENTIRELY MISCONSTRUED, is fucking hilarious 😀 Gosh... if only there was some theory out there that Actualized is a toxic shit-hole which corrodes peoples reasoning? I wonder if that might explain this users instability after being treated like shit by a bullying moderator? Yes of course I make mistakes, but there are certain behaviours which are so egregious that they warrant a bit more attention than "oopsie". If I see someone on the street shouting racist remarks at someone, I don' t think "oh well, I'm sure he just had a blip", I see some major red flags. I see those same major red flags in your behaviour. The shift in this thread from aggressor, to victim mentality, to smug righteousness - all while not being able to string one coherent case together, yeah I think that's a red flag. I think you are delusional. I do label myself, I literally just did it when I said I consider myself rational, not a rationalist - How are you not following this? Nowhere did I ever state that I never label myself , so no there is no double standard. Lets stick with this one because its a good example of how incoherent your thought process is. Lets step through this 1. "I never label myself" - you claim I said this, but I didn't 2. Based upon that thing which never happened, you accuse me of a double standard, but it never happened This is what I refer to when I say you are pulling things out of your arse, and its all here in this thread as evidence, so its baffling how you keep getting it so wrong. Every post I make has to debunk the false assumptions you make in the post prior, but you keep doing it and then get pissy when I point it out. You cannot comprehend a simple conversation, its not an insult, its a fact. So no, its not a double standard. I don't think you even know what "double standard" means. Like I said earlier, and I mean this with absolute sincerity - I think you are (among other things) utterly delusional. All you have demonstrated in this conversation is a Joe Biden level of "not knowing what the fuck is happening", but its all there on record and I am more than happy to keep pointing it out. Lets go one better since you seem keen for the challenge and expressed an earlier interest. Why don't you come on my channel and we can have this conversation in live in real time, and you can expose me for all the things you claim. You could really bring me down a peg or two - what do you say? 😀 Ha! These narrative re-framings are really something, seriously 🤣

Lets have a reality check here - @Robed Mystic engaged with ME in a smartass way, and now that his ego is bruised he is playing the victim card. Its pathetic. Lets revisit his opening statement and see if we can ascertain why the conversation contains an element of hostility. "Rationality should be embraced but it is not the end all be all and ultimately it must be transcended into the transrational. Actualized does not try to demonize rationalism it simply goes beyond it. The problem is you can't get over yourself long enough to realize that. Your ego is about inflated as a helium balloon. So please, spare us the sermons bro." So you tell me @Robed Mystic where did the belittling start? The gaslighting and hypocrisy on display here is amazing. Leo would be proud! Phil - obviously its your forum so feel free to do what you want with it. I will say that out of respect for this community I have been far more cordial than I think his behaviour deserves

@Robed Mystic Apologies for the bluntness but there is no other way to say it. I think the mods, in particular yourself, are one of the worst aspects of the Actualized forum. You might recall that I have called you out specifically on Actualized for your bullying demeanour and banning people - I would be happy to dig up all the links if you like? Just from memory you called someone a traitor, stated that they are the worst of the worst, and then banned them - all because they disagreed with your definition of God. Luckily even Leo recognized that you were acting irrationally and reinstated the user, but it was a thoroughly putrid misuse of power. Due to your poor comprehension and impulsive temperament you are (in my opinion) in no way qualified to moderate anything, and that you put yourself forward as an example of a stabilizing element within Actualized is concerning rather than comforting. OK this is quite a jaw dropper of misunderstanding. I cannot "screenshot" the corrosion of someone losing their grip on rational thought, that's not how the human psyche works. I can show you some behaviour which demonstrates a lack of reason and rationality, and I can propose a correlation between those behaviours and a certain online community. The behaviours themselves are documented right here, remember? Its the thread you are commenting on. Again I am not intending this to be an insult, but communicating with you is like communicating with someone who cannot follow one moment to the next, and constantly misinterprets everything, or just makes things up. Case in point... I don't think I do, nor do I think I have ever made a statement to that effect, so again we have something pulled fresh out of your arse. I certainly consider myself to be rational, but being rational and a rationalist are two different things. Now YOU might deem me to be a rationalist, but I think that's just because you seem to obsess over what labels you can assign to people - Person X is enlightened, person Y is awakened, person Z is materialist (that was something you previously declared me as, please make your mind up). If you want to know my actual beliefs you are welcome to ask me or you can ascertain it from watching my videos. No of course you don't NEED to go to an Ashram, nor any of the other activities I listed, but they are experiences which offer growth, different perspectives, and a sense of human connection which is sorely lacking from the online world. If sitting on your own works for you then you go for it.

@Robed Mystic I'm not sure what to tell you mate, and honestly I am not using any of these words as insults. Its not that I think I am so much smarter than EVERYONE ELSE, its that I think that YOU in particular have a very poor grasp of language and conversation, and that combined with your hot headed nature you frequently write things which are of zero relevance to the topic at hand. That's not ME being smart, its YOU not taking the time to read properly and acting impulsively, hence why I keep asking you to try harder. Meaningful conversation can actually occur if you aren't just bellowing random shit at people. In regard to your attempt to downplay Actualized as "a forum with people mentally masturbating", yes I 100% agree - that is exactly what it is. The part that you seem ignorant of is that the interactions within online communities create real world behaviours. "Forums with people mentally masturbating" have given your country Q'anon, The Capitol Riots, divisive social contagion...etc. People in forums encourage each other to starve or cut themselves, or adopt incel ideologies. These are well documented phenomenon so this idea of yours that something is just "a forum with people mentally masturbating" shows an astonishing level of naivety about human beings and online culture. Then we have Actualized.org which encourages fast track spirituality, mental masturbation (your words not mine), no integration, a culture of belittling and bullying, a leader with a highly questionable moral compass, who promotes reckless use of substances, and which even YOU would agree has lost his fucking marbles - and you don't think that is capable of having an effect on the psyche of its users... seriously? Clearly this is bullshit - we both know it is. If it didn't have some effect (positive or negative) on the psyche of its users then nobody would ever go there - THINK ABOUT IT. Nobody ever said that it is a physical ashram, so please don't pull things out of your arse. Since you bring it up though then its actually far worse than a physical ashram in my opinion because it has no social glue like an actual physical community. Just half-baked unearned psychobabble commentary from uneducated people like yourself and Leo who have very little life experience, and substitute that lack of human connection for "all you can eat" mental masturbation. By all means go to an actual ashram and sit at the feet of a guru, go on retreat and drink some ayahuasca with a shaman, do some actual work instead of simply mentally masturbating yourself.

Yes its absolutely clear that you impulsively disagree with me, lets take that as a given. The point I demonstrated is that you don't actually understand WHAT you are disagreeing WITH, and so you fill that lack of understanding with things you simply pull out of your arse. You you do the exact same thing here in this post, so lets take a look together 🙂 So straight away you have missed the point and shifted the goalposts. Firstly I never stated that individual episodes of the Actualized YouTube channel corrode rationality (not rationalism as you stated, there is a difference, go learn the actual meanings etc). What I said was... "I think you are a perfect snapshot of how corrosive the Actualized mindset is to reason and rationality" I put a couple of bits in bold there to help you with your comprehension, coz you know...its you. The "I think" prefix denotes that this is my personal thoughts, so all your rambling around me stating this as an absolute is unsurprisingly... complete bullshit based upon your inability to comprehend basic written text. Again, I know this is hard for you, but just TRY. The "Actualized mindset" part shows that I am not referring to specific episodes or their contents, but rather to the cumulative effects of being part of that community and absorbing its "teachings", the result being that it appears to eat away at ones ability to think critically. As justification for why I hold this opinion I would simply gesture in the direction of Leo Gura jabbering about physically transforming into aliens, Devin pulling conspiracy theories out of his arse, and you just being you, as prime examples of "The Actualized Mindset" which has resulted in the corrosion of reasoning and rationality, something which is easily demonstrable in this very thread. But yes, just in case there is any confusion that is 100% just my opinion.