Jump to content

Enlightenment, Nonduality.


Recommended Posts

I think you become enlightened when you realize that awareness is not sense experience or the mind.  You realize the witness as a thing and as you (but not the egoic you).  The egoic you is seen in awareness.  It's this shift I think where someone becomes enlightened.  It's not that confusing actually.  What makes it confusing I think is people conflate spiritual enlightenment with ego development work without realizing these are kinda two separate things.  There's stuff after spiritual enlightenment, but I think that's where you become enlightened -- when you discover the witness as self and as not body and not mind.  Your sense of self changes from what it was before.  Before you thought awareness was mind.  Once you have that shift and it doesn't go away, you're enlightened.  Now there's more development work you can do from there, of course.  People even call this ego development work.  To be more nuanced, spiritual enlightenment is both different than and similar to "ego development work." There's a wobble in that duality. But in some sense, spiritual enlightenment is its own thing too.  And it can be talked about as its own thing independent from relation to the other (whatever that other may be).  

Nice to see one of your videos.  You sound like me where you seem (to me) to struggle to even put a narrative together sometimes because you're so wide in awareness.  I have to force myself sometimes to share the simple answer, but also qualify it as a pointer too.  That struggle to put a narrative together is a sign of high-consciousness, it's nothing to be ashamed of.  The more conscious you become the harder it is to put your narratives together to convey your experience to others.  People should notice this and see why this is happening.  It's because it's harder to create pointers to higher levels of development.  How do you show this, how do you tell this?  And you see all the traps too.  So you're leary about what you say too because you know that different pointers go with different perspectives and can be misinterpreted too.  But you don't want to be so caveat heavy that you're basically telling people to disregard what you're saying.  People expect a certain level of confidence in any narrative put forward as good from the person putting it forward.  

Edited by Joseph Maynor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Joseph Maynor said:

I think you become enlightened when you realize that awareness is not sense experience or the mind.  You realize the witness as a thing and as you (but not the egoic you).  The egoic you is seen in awareness.  It's this shift I think where someone becomes enlightened.  It's not that confusing actually.  What makes it confusing I think is people conflate spiritual enlightenment with ego development work without realizing these are kinda two separate things.  There's stuff after spiritual enlightenment, but I think that's where you become enlightened -- when you discover the witness as self and as not body and not mind.  Your sense of self changes from what it was before.  Before you thought awareness was mind.  Once you have that shift and it doesn't go away, you're enlightened.  Now there's more development work you can do from there, of course.  People even call this ego development work.  To be more nuanced, spiritual enlightenment is both different than and similar to "ego development work." There's a wobble in that duality. But in some sense, spiritual enlightenment is its own thing too.  And it can be talked about as its own thing independent from relation to the other (whatever that other may be).  

Nice to see one of your videos.  You sound like me where you seem (to me) to struggle to even put a narrative together sometimes because you're so wide in awareness.  I have to force myself sometimes to share the simple answer, but also qualify it as a pointer too.  That struggle to put a narrative together is a sign of high-consciousness, it's nothing to be ashamed of.  The more conscious you become the harder it is to put your narratives together to convey your experience to others.  People should notice this and see why this is happening.  It's because it's harder to create pointers to higher levels of development.  How do you show this, how do you tell this?  And you see all the traps too.  So you're leary about what you say too because you know that different pointers go with different perspectives and can be misinterpreted too.  But you don't want to be so caveat heavy that you're basically telling people to disregard what you're saying.  People expect a certain level of confidence in any narrative put forward as good from the person putting it forward.  

Is time real?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By clicking, I agree to the terms of use, rules, guidelines & to hold Actuality of Being LLC, admin, moderators & all forum members harmless.