Jump to content

God

Member
  • Posts

    148
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by God

  1. 12 minutes ago, Faith said:

    @God So, I'm gonna be real honest right now and say that I don't feel so sorry for you.

    Good.

     

    12 minutes ago, Faith said:

    You have brought up my name as "Ananta" and "Faith" on Actualized, recently. So, how about YOU stop talking about ME on that forum? 

    Because I wanted you to see it, so I mentioned "Faith".

    When I was unfairly given 20 points on Actualized, of course I was annoyed at Ananta.  That's not gonna change.
    But Faith seems like a nicer person.  I don't have any problems with you, but I won't mention you again as you like.

     

    12 minutes ago, Faith said:

    Anyways, @Joseph Maynor didn't break any guidelines as far as I've seen, unless it's on another thread. If that's the case, then report it. 

    Well I've blocked him.  But if I call him a (moderator edit), I don't expect any warning points as that's not against the rules.  It's only referring to information he's made public.

  2. 4 minutes ago, Faith said:

    He said your 24, relax. 

     

    I'm really surprised how upset he has you. 

     

    Cause he just won't stop.  He's like this on Actualized too.  And half a year ago when I was here he was the same.  He has a personal grudge against me, and the whole forum seems to be on his side.

     

    I can play games for a looong time, but some people just don't get the message 'till you tell them to fuck off.

     

    Oh and low blood sugar rn.. been busy for the past 8 hours.

  3.  

    8 minutes ago, Faith said:

    @God You gave out your age on a public forum, therefore he can restate your age, as long as he doesn't call you a name about it. 

     

    If someone publicly says they're BPD/autistic/gay/fat/etc., then I guess I'll be ok with using that as a weapon when arguments don't go my way.

    I can tell how severe Joe's weight problems are, he's made it public.  Guess I don't need to hold back.  He really is the "big" dog around here.

  4. 6 minutes ago, Joseph Maynor said:

    Dude you talk like you're the only one in the room.  You exist within a community of people who have different functional roles.  You can't just act like a bowling ball barreling down the alley all the time.  Be more diplomatic and sensitive in your use of language.  I know you want to appear strong and masculine, but that is also earned through building relationships and being softer in your approach.  You're having a kind of narcissistic rage event lately.  Do what Leo has done and then compare yourself to him on the merits.  

    What are you talking about?

    I'm a former UX designer.  I could charge thousands for this shit.  I just don't like using a poorly designed website every day, so am giving away all my thoughts to Leo for free, in hopes he takes away even a single idea.

     

    Leave me alone already.  You're not interested in civilized discussions, and seek only to project your alpha-dog biases onto me.  I do not wish to be associated with you in any way.  Leave.

  5. 7 minutes ago, Faith said:

    @God You can email Leo yourself with what you need. Its his forum and he's also tech support. 

    I don't like forcing anyone into a formal decision.  I just want open communication.

    I wrote a rant in The Journal, but Leo doesn't care.

    Functionally, this forum is objectively superior to Actualized.  I never have to wait 111 seconds to post again.  I'm shocked Leo's just gonna let that slide.  The copycat is better than the original, and he doesn't care.  If he cares THAT little, and he chooses to ignore all my suggestions, Actualized.org deserves to die.  As simple as that.  Of course I'd prefer he comes to his senses and takes my suggestions seriously.

  6. 2 minutes ago, Mandy said:

    I can imagine. The dating section was always such a nightmare. I don't know how any female mod could stand it for long. 

    lol, it's basically the only section Leo's ever active in.  And I think Puporing is the only female mod that's somewhat active.  But the forum is so peaceful I don't think there's a real need for more mods.  I'm the only person on the forum who might be controversial sometimes, but even I never actually cause trouble.

     

  7. 1 minute ago, Faith said:

    I KNOW!! 😂

     

    🤣

     

    Modding was a lot harder on Actualized. Ppl constantly reporting each other, spammers, name calling, closing threads, multiple accounts users, ect it was like a full time job.

     

    @God Not naming anyone, but some mods aren't good mods. Good meaning actually doing some work. 

     

    Today I asked a mod to share an idea on the mod-forum.  They essentially just told me to fuck off.  It sucks having to rely on mods for basic things.

  8. 7 minutes ago, Mandy said:

    😂Thanks.😂 It REALLY IS THOUGH. I always thought that being a mod might ruin actualized for me, (although Leo never would not have let that happen anyway) but I didn't expect it to happen here on any level. Didn't even really realize it was happening. 

    How is it hard? 

    Literally no different to being a member, except if someone starts insulting people personally you can delete their posts.

     

    I talk to Carl-Richard, a mod from the other side, every day, and the last time he actually did something was like a month or 2 ago.  The only real difference between him and members is he gets a nice stage Green username.

  9. 9 minutes ago, Mandy said:

    Thanks! I think my tantrum helped me drop the identification of being a mod and thinking that mean I couldn't have much fun with it at the same time, I dunno. 😂

     

    @God Much better, thank you, looking God! I mean good. Muscles kinda full of himself, kinda Zeus like, but what's in his hand? A whole lotta 4th of July sparklers or something? 

    A bolt.

     

    7 minutes ago, Faith said:

    It's a challenge that members don't understand or appreciate fully. Meaning, we want to post and have a laugh too, but we also have to be the police at the same time. It's a balancing act ⚖️ and it sometimes doesn't seem worth the time/effort. An occasional tantrum is okay 😂🤣😂

    Lemme know if it becomes too much for ya:classic_wink:

  10. 1 minute ago, Faith said:

    Banned? I didn't ban you. Obviously you aren't banned. If you were banned you wouldn't be writing in this thread right now. 

    Maybe my new profile pic will help your memory😏

     

    1 minute ago, Faith said:

    Thanks girl! 👊

    That remains to be seen.

    Ananta was not.

  11. 5 minutes ago, Lester Retsel said:

    Its fine.  

    Well then the rest confirms what I was saying.

    Having never heard of the concept of "functions", it can be concluded you don't even know what MBTI is.

    I, too, have no interest in models I've not discovered yet.

     

    Actually that's a lie, I'm totally interested in things I've not discovered yet :")

  12. 5 minutes ago, Lester Retsel said:

    I prefer other models, the qabalistic tree of life for example, but I don't insist on talking to people in those terms.  

    You disagree with the universally accepted 4 stages of learning?

    They're pretty self-evident.  I don't think it's even possible to dispute them.

  13. 7 minutes ago, Lester Retsel said:

    I also often see people use Meyers Briggs and spiral dynamics to sort of justify something about themselve

    Really?  Where have you seen this?  On this forum?

    People rarely even reveal their stages on Actualized.org, as it makes some people self-conscious.

    Criteria is pretty specific for each stage.  No Green could ever pass for Turquoise, for example.

  14. 8 minutes ago, Lester Retsel said:

    I do have an interest in psychology, just not those "types" and I think people should be able to articulate whatever points they're trying to make without relying on these short hands, that never really do justice to what is being talked about anyway, I have looked up the meanings of all those Meyers Briggs types, and I just don't think anyone is as simple as any one them.  Same with spiral dynamics.  And people who write shit off by labeling anything "stage red" or whatever just annoy the living piss outta me.

    Sand-Update-3-StagesOfLearning-1120x797.

    You're still at the first stage.

    Once you learn what functions and Socionics are, and start making connections between people and specific functions, you'll enter Conscious Incompetence.

  15. 3 minutes ago, Mandy said:

    @God Liked him better fat. 

    Wait.. you have a YouTube channel?  I assumed you're a guy when Atheistic mentioned you😨😨

    So much content to type you off😈😈😈

  16. 1 minute ago, Faith said:

     

    To all the Actualizers out there....

     

    join-our-family-join-us.gif.4d3535760b739c82914432210581a8f3.gif

     

     

    Might have to.  I've made the entire forum mad.

    I'm hiding in here.  They'll find me eventually.

  17. 1 minute ago, Lester Retsel said:

    More those who strongly identify as them, or any of those types, and talk about it a lot.  Same with spiral dynamics.  I find it annoying, yeah, and it's much too reductive if ya ask me.  I shut down when someone tries to explain to me which "personality type" they are.

    And, of course, you never had interest in it to begin with?  What validity is there to your views when you don't even have an interest in psychology?

    If I have zero interest in cars, my opinion on car engines wouldn't really hold much weight.  You have zero interest in psychology, so why would anyone care about your opinion?

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By clicking, I agree to the terms of use, rules, guidelines & to hold Actuality of Being LLC, admin, moderators & all forum members harmless.