Jump to content

Is all morality and all good versus bad only a judgment? Moral conflict question


Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, Reena said:

First thing comes first. There is the context.

If there seems to be context, there is awareness of what there seems to be. Thus context doesn’t come first; awareness is always prior. 

Awareness is aware and appearing as so called thoughts, or “context”. 

 

13 hours ago, Reena said:

Absolute and relative.

In accordance with direct experience, awareness is aware.

Awareness is not aware of two awarenesses.

Awareness is not aware of ‘two’ anything at all. 

Awareness is aware of an apparent thought, about there being other than awareness - such as a “duality”; an absolute & a relative. 

 

13 hours ago, Reena said:

Relative means relative to human system.

Awareness is aware of apparent thought(s), that there is awareness and  “meaning”, and “humans”, and “a human system”. 

 

13 hours ago, Reena said:

In the absolute sense, nothing is wrong or right.

Awareness is aware, that it is, aware. Awareness is aware of, awareness. 

 

Apparent thoughts are… apparent. 

 

In believing apparent thoughts, awareness overlooks that awareness is awarenes… and believes there is: an absolute and a relative, humans and a humans system. 

 

As awareness overlooks awareness, and believes “thoughts” which awareness is appearing as…

awareness believes there is a “second self” - a “self” which is not awareness… a “finite self”….

a “second self”… which “knows”… that there is; an absolute, a relative, humans, human systems, something & nothing, and… wrong & right. 

 

 

Awareness believes there is awareness (not a thing, infinite, nothingness, nothing)… and … “some thing”… which is not… awareness… … … 

 

13 hours ago, Reena said:

Nothing is good or bad. Everything is okay. Everything is perfect. 

Awareness believes there is; nothing and everything, good & bad…. 

By overlooking awareness… and believing “what another separate self” is “saying”…

… by overlooking the “first” “second, separate self”… is a believing of thoughts; a belief. 

 

13 hours ago, Reena said:

But we live as humans. So the absolute is nice on paper but it's not applicable to our reality. So we have to work within the confines of the Relative. 

And so there - seems to be - awareness and a “separate, second self”… “living”…”in”…  “our reality”. 

 

 

 

 

And so… “we have to work within the confines of the relative”. 

 

Is really… “I (the separate self), the knower so many dualities, have to work in the confines of conjecture”. 

 

In truth, that is, as awareness… there is no “morality” at all. 

Only the apparent thought, same as any “other” “thing”. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By clicking, I agree to the terms of use, rules, guidelines & to hold Actuality of Being LLC, admin, moderators & all forum members harmless.