God

I agree. This is not something people often pay attention to or care about. But you started the bad faith, so I'm not taking you seriously anymore.

😂😂😂 At this point I'm just joking around. With those two I've given up on real discussion.

I've been posting on Actualized all day, lol😂😉

In other words, you're admitting my words are getting through to you, and your opinions have now changed in light of the new reality to which you're now awake.

You're trolling yourself with these claims.

A fraction of the potential. You don't make 2 hour videos of nothing but talk just to make money. This is the exact opposite of how you make money on youtube. Leo maximizes effort in making videos, while minimizing viewer retention, engagement, etc. He doesn't have sponsors, doesn't really use clickbait in the title or thumbnail, and doesn't even suggest that we're missing out or that we need his courses. He genuinely just wants to educate. If he decided to truly milk the channel, you would know. . he'd start doing sales, promo codes, he'd cut his series short and tell people to pay up for part 2 and 3, etc.

Someone your age should have better judgement. And you won't get much compassion from me with that attitude of yours. Leo is just a man. Likely much younger than you, with less life experience than you. What did you expect him to teach you? Leo's also not very business-oriented. He's not exactly trying to milk his content. The overwhelming majority of his content is available for free, on purpose. He doesn't keep anything behind a paywall. You only pay if you want to support him, or if you don't care about money.

Wait.. you paid Leo? lolwut Every single concept of his is free to listen to on youtube. The only things you pay for are maybe some pickup courses. You have only yourself to blame for doing something this dumb.

Mostly right. Depends on your definitions. Of course God isn't lonely. You'd have to create that emotion to experience it. But God/source/the-one/oneness, is unity, and is one, and is alone. There aren't multiple "sources" or "the ones" or "the onenesses".

You are the only creator. You can exist in any reality you like. But your infinite self has infinite preferences😉 Ideas like "co-creation" are just beliefs we use to feel less lonely. But we're all alone, always will be, always have been. All alone, for all eternity. By definition, God is alone.

lol. Well, basically, we all live in separate dimensions of existence. We can interact, but our realities can never merge into one. In my dimension, I am God. In yours, you are God. But to me, you are just that which I experience. A rock has consciousness through me in whatever form I experience the rock in. You are no different to me. Your words exist through my consciousness in the form of text.

Well it's true. I am God, the one and only. And if anyone disagrees and gets angry, that's just an opportunity for them to realize the truth and grow.

😂😂😂 God is love💁🏻‍♂️

Fair enough. It's 5am so I'm tired, and the other guys here were annoying to deal with.. sorry if I'm too intense. But solipsism actually has fewer assumptions than the alternative. Solipsism removes the assumption that the outside world exists, and states that only the world you experience should be considered real, as all else can only ever be an assumption.

Yes, but that's a more advanced concept that comes later on. We're teaching a beginner class here. If someone can't understand solipsism, there's no way they're gonna be able to comprehend pantheism.

I am as calm as a.. [insert calm thing here]😌 And * sigh * Why must you "believe" or "disbelieve" something? We're not in church school anymore. Is it theoretically possible for you to ever experience anything outside your brain, during your life? Tell me. Your body has senses which send signals to the brain. They all get interpreted as "the world" in your brain, yes? So tell me. Tell me about the world outside your mind that you've experienced, since solipsism is just a dumb weird belief.

"overwhelming majority" and 95% are the same thing. "overwhelming majority" just means roughly 85%+.. which includes 95% "super overwhelming majority", which might be more specific, is not a term in use.

Wait.. you don't understand solipsism? You do realise you can only experience that which your brain produces for you, yes? You have never left your mind, and never will. That's self-evident. I hope this much is clear at least. and omg.. did you never learn "estimates" in school? Would it make you happier if I said "overwhelming majority" instead? Saying 95% is quicker and more accurate to what I feel to be a good estimate. In regard to your last point - you didn't even address my point and simply made a vague generalization, not at all conducive to our discussion here.. Oh and.. no need for the snark remarks. Makes you seem insecure and immature. You've got yourself an even more concentrated echo chamber here. On Leo's forum, plenty of people are critical of Leo, and plenty are not. It's balanced. Here's it's nothing but an echo chamber of hate.

Jeez, going for the low hanging fruit, are we? Of course I didn't do a scientific study to come up with an exact figure of 95.0000%. I meant he gets more than 9/10 things right, but less than 10/10. The self-evident metaphysical concepts he talks about are all self-evident. Nothing he says requires you to believe in anything. Leo doesn't offer you dogma. You either get them, or you don't. He doesn't say "there are x number of dimensions, and the meaning of life is x, etc.". If you're approaching this from a "what belief feels good" standpoint, then you will never understand what he talks about. In religion you're expected to believe, but this is not what actualization is about. If you believe ANYTHING he says, then you don't get it. Belief is a sure-fire way to know you don't get it.

I think he may just be tailoring his advice for men. Humans are still animals, and we still run on programming that's thousands/millions of years outdated. Intellectually, you may be disgusted by the idea of men dominating women, but many people, men and women, are still heavily influenced by such genetic remnants from the past. Leo's just recognized this, and is telling men to take advantage of this fact. And why not? Follow his advice, and you'll get sex from slutty women. He's not wrong, and it doesn't harm anyone. Everyone wins.

Thanks for your opinion. I think it's weird how much time he spends writing about pickup, but I haven't seen anything bad from him myself. I don't spend much time on the dating suforum, so maybe you saw something I haven't. I'm open to the possibility of him being sexist, but I'd have to see evidence of this first. I understand his intellect very well, and I'd consider it unlikely that he's a sexist pig. From what I've seen, he's too aware to actually be sexist. It would seem more likely that you misunderstood some of his comments or took them too literally.

ad hominem I've given you many chances. I will stop wasting my time. Grow up. I now see why Leo banned you.

I've never had to put up with such childish behavior on Leo's forum. I feel like I'm arguing with school-kids. "No, u wrong!! No, you dumb!". This is not a great first impression.

Try to counter a single point of mine. I'll wait.

Again, can't counter even a single point I made. Don't be a sore loser.