Let's discuss where corruption started and hasn't been corrected yet.

[solereproduction]

I will start using genetic specific results evolving forward as ancestrally making up current global population occupying space here and I think I have done the mathematic algorithm that covers evolving of this species since inception of original DNA streaming of ancestral lineages each generation gap existed to existing in series parallel displacements compounding DNA as never duplicated ancestors twice.

 

Thermodynamic  principles covers molecular migration between combined forms to erosion and conceptions to decomposition as exactly occupying time here.

 

 

Adapting as evolving one of a kind is instinctively self evident by proportionately alive.

 

Please everyone this is about correcting reasonable doubt, not destroying those disagreeing with me because history interpreted life differently by each reality present..

 

 

[Phil]

28 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

I will start using genetic specific results evolving forward as ancestrally making up current global population occupying space here

Trying to get on the same page first.

Does what you said above mean the same as ‘people’? If not, what is the difference? That would really help clarify (at my end). 

Is it the same saying, ‘I will start with people’?

 

28 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

and I think I have done the mathematic algorithm that covers evolving of this species since inception of original DNA streaming of ancestral lineages each generation gap existed to existing in series parallel displacements compounding DNA as never duplicated ancestors twice.

Is this the same as saying ‘we must include relativity, special relativity and the revelation of time dilation to arrive at the present diversity’? If not, what is the difference? Thanks. 

 

28 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

Thermodynamic  principles covers molecular migration between combined forms to erosion and conceptions to decomposition as exactly occupying time here.

Is this the same as law of attraction, or maybe the assumed inverse of gravity? If not, what’s the difference? 

 

28 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

Adapting as evolving one of a kind is instinctively self evident by proportionately alive.

Is this the same as saying one being is appearing as a multiplicity of beings? If not, what’s the difference? 

 

28 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

 

Please everyone this is about correcting reasonable doubt, not destroying those disagreeing with me because history interpreted life differently by each reality present..

 

 

This part seems clear (at my end). Is reasonable doubt incorrect / something to be corrected? If so, why? What is the worthwhileness, what would change?

How can one arrive at there being more than one reality? 

[solereproduction]

15 hours ago, Phil said:

Trying to get on the same page first.

Does what you said above mean the same as ‘people’? If not, what is the difference? That would really help clarify (at my end). 

Is it the same saying, ‘I will start with people’?

 

Is this the same as saying ‘we must include relativity, special relativity and the revelation of time dilation to arrive at the present diversity’? If not, what is the difference? Thanks. 

 

Is this the same as law of attraction, or maybe the assumed inverse of gravity? If not, what’s the difference? 

 

Is this the same as saying one being is appearing as a multiplicity of beings? If not, what’s the difference? 

 

This part seems clear (at my end). Is reasonable doubt incorrect / something to be corrected? If so, why? What is the worthwhileness, what would change?

How can one arrive at there being more than one reality? 

1. No

2. People is a noun same as we, they, them, those. Ancestors to ancestry are direct link reproductions occupying space at the same time here in multiple generation gaps since arriving after inception of DNA streaming of numbers remaining alive now. Results, not speculation life exceeds the moment here.

3. living starts individually here at conception to replace one's 4 previous generation gaps and even in evolving/mutating another species from an existing one, there will be an event horizon that separation occurred from a couple reproductive cycles of previous species and new species co existing after the event.

4. Why are you dividing relativity into two categories. regular and special then adding a third revelation time changes everything instead of being honest everything is only changing now. There is the core of reasonable doubt one species imposed upon itself historically.

5. Laws of attraction are strictly about magnetic forces, not emotional results and responses.

6. Gravity is simply cohesion of molecular combinations that sustain a perpetual balancing universal moment here from combinations of gaseous, liquid, mineral chemical periodic elements of stable combined atoms. Characters of forms shaping what exists evolving individual universal points of displacement becoming regular cycles of changes completed so far.

7. Degrees of separation dividing the whole into exponential parts having a common core of time existing here now. 

8. 7 axses, 3 perpendicular, 4 diagonally 5 parallel vertical 1 horizontal between 6 degrees of separation philosophy think outside self containment of your own skin and reverse psychologies 6 degrees of separation working radii interpretations of debating only two sides of any story/conflicting interpretation/talking point creating reasonable doubt now is eternity among 5 generation gpas living covering previous 4 generations and each arriving great great grandchild replacing previous 4 linking system genetics does in plain sight.  eternally separating "people" by the numbers ancestrally displaced in this atmosphere. Specific gravity of the moment. Kinetics vs potential outcomes.

9. yes

10. Reasonable doubt is incomplete total sum understood by each is good enough to be factual, moral, legal, ethical ways to command "people" to demand human right to never admit now is eternity and punish anyone that does. Tyranny comes from this be it dictatorship or democracy. That is why reasonable doubt is key to nobody knows how evolving works in plain sight.

11. Restoring the natural balancing denied for over 400 generations working societal evolution this species practices against itself against each generation gap added. Now being eternity constantly denying genetics eternally separates reproductions present, intellectual mind created a physical eternal hell within its own species corrupting all 5 generation gaps to repeat the process of never accepting now is eternity.

12. Instinctive honesty is a crime against humanity's promises of better tomorrows each rotation of the planet. That is simply wrong, right?

 

All that is left is people doing what this species has done historically since civilization started defining life begins with birth, not conceived to replace previous 4 generation gaps.

[Phil]

2 hours ago, solereproduction said:

1. No

2. People is a noun same as we, they, them, those. Ancestors to ancestry are direct link reproductions occupying space at the same time here in multiple generation gaps since arriving after inception of DNA streaming of numbers remaining alive now. Results, not speculation life exceeds the moment here.

Thanks. Starting to see more where you’re coming from so to speak. How aren’t those nouns as well? (Ancestors, etc). 

 

2 hours ago, solereproduction said:

3. living starts individually here at conception to replace one's 4 previous generation gaps and even in evolving/mutating another species from an existing one, there will be an event horizon that separation occurred from a couple reproductive cycles of previous species and new species co existing after the event.

Is there previous to now though? 

 

2 hours ago, solereproduction said:

4. Why are you dividing relativity into two categories. regular and special then adding a third revelation time changes everything instead of being honest everything is only changing now. There is the core of reasonable doubt one species imposed upon itself historically.

To reference. Time dilation doesn’t change anything. That’s the point of the reference. 

Does living start individually? 

Wouldn’t that imply (at least) two divisions?

 

2 hours ago, solereproduction said:

5. Laws of attraction are strictly about magnetic forces, not emotional results and responses.

What are magical forces?

 

2 hours ago, solereproduction said:

6. Gravity is simply cohesion of molecular combinations that sustain a perpetual balancing universal moment here from combinations of gaseous, liquid, mineral chemical periodic elements of stable combined atoms. Characters of forms shaping what exists evolving individual universal points of displacement becoming regular cycles of changes completed so far.

What’s forms?

 

2 hours ago, solereproduction said:

7. Degrees of separation dividing the whole into exponential parts having a common core of time existing here now. 

If time exists, is this in time, or out of time? 

 

2 hours ago, solereproduction said:

 

8. 7 axses, 3 perpendicular, 4 diagonally 5 parallel vertical 1 horizontal between 6 degrees of separation philosophy think outside self containment of your own skin and reverse psychologies 6 degrees of separation working radii interpretations of debating only two sides of any story/conflicting interpretation/talking point creating reasonable doubt now is eternity among 5 generation gpas living covering previous 4 generations and each arriving great great grandchild replacing previous 4 linking system genetics does in plain sight.  eternally separating "people" by the numbers ancestrally displaced in this atmosphere. Specific gravity of the moment. Kinetics vs potential outcomes.

What’s a thinker? (Which could think outside skin). 

 

2 hours ago, solereproduction said:

 

9. yes

10. Reasonable doubt is incomplete total sum understood by each is good enough to be factual, moral, legal, ethical ways to command "people" to demand human right to never admit now is eternity and punish anyone that does. Tyranny comes from this be it dictatorship or democracy. That is why reasonable doubt is key to nobody knows how evolving works in plain sight.

What’s an understander?

How is doubt reasonable, as compared with felt?

 

2 hours ago, solereproduction said:

11. Restoring the natural balancing denied for over 400 generations working societal evolution this species practices against itself against each generation gap added. Now being eternity constantly denying genetics eternally separates reproductions present, intellectual mind created a physical eternal hell within its own species corrupting all 5 generation gaps to repeat the process of never accepting now is eternity.

What’s a denier? 

Is there generations because there is time?

What if there isn’t time? 

 

2 hours ago, solereproduction said:

12. Instinctive honesty is a crime against humanity's promises of better tomorrows each rotation of the planet. That is simply wrong, right?

 

All that is left is people doing what this species has done historically since civilization started defining life begins with birth, not conceived to replace previous 4 generation gaps.

Well, that instinct is experienced isn’t per se wrong or right, but is an assumption. A perversion via inversion. 

What’s a doer?

[solereproduction]

40 minutes ago, Phil said:

Thanks. Starting to see more where you’re coming from so to speak. How aren’t those nouns as well? (Ancestors, etc). 

 

Is there previous to now though? 

Quote

yes, total sum of past experiences evolving from a fertilized cell into the boy adapting to space mutually timed apart here.  Thoughts are verbal translations of communicating evolving as one of a kind collectively here.

 

To reference. Time dilation doesn’t change anything. That’s the point of the reference. 

Does living start individually? 

Quote

inception of a mutated DNA stream ancestral streaming of generation gaps still reproducing or became extinct. It is a universal constant. expanding numbers contracting results compounding DNA of previous additions. that exponential 2 forward one added beyond at a time. Not every reproduction becomes a parent. Siblings that do keep the DNA going forward inversely to arrival in each generation gap.

Wouldn’t that imply (at least) two divisions?

Quote

every division, reproductive cell's nucleus is the brain of the body delivered at birth with a body having a nervous system so every cell can communicate instinctively functioning to adapt in space mutually evolving forward now as each ancestor has from inception.

 

What are magical forces?

Quote

hyperbole.

 

What’s forms?

Quote

Spiritual fantasies of exceeding life now, political ambitions to control everyone else around using science fiction. Theory and hypothetical situations. The what if and what about diversions from actual existing.

 

If time exists, is this in time, or out of time? 

Quote

 

Duration of occupying the moment comparing event horizons each experiences mutually evolving forward now. History recited is socially performed following scripted mandates on who's who typecast and stereotyped.

 

What’s a thinker? (Which could think outside skin). 

Quote

Denier of self

 

What’s an understander? 

Quote

understanding self proportioned being alive now since conceived to replace the 30 lives of one's previous 4 generation gaps lived already so far.

How is doubt reasonable, as compared with felt?

Quote

not comparable, feel is current, felt is a past event that won't exist again.

 

What’s a denier? 

Quote

an ancestor that believes they exist beyond natural displacement to eternally separated now.

Is there generations because there is time?

Quote

No.  Occupying space evolving conceived to decomposed is personal time evolving as eternally separated here in plain sight of everything universally present beyond one's own skin.

What if there isn’t time?

Quote

The nothing existed to this point.  Again time isn't a linear algorithm, it is the time the total sum is what remains here next as individually univerally present part within the whole exchange between did and does continue here.

 

 

Well, that instinct is experienced isn’t per se wrong or right, but is an assumption. A perversion via inversion. 

Quote

Completely accurate or incompletely inaccurate every time recited each generation forward sustaining eternal separation of lifetimes left as current 5 generation gaps evolving now and everyone playing role models to concepts anything else is possible.

What’s a doer?

Quote

lifetime adapting to the moment honestly or corrupted cradle to grave.  

 

 

[Phil]

20 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

yes, total sum of past experiences evolving from a fertilized cell into the boy adapting to space mutually timed apart here.  Thoughts are verbal translations of communicating evolving as one of a kind collectively here.

How does one get there? (The there previous to now)

 

23 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

inception of a mutated DNA stream ancestral streaming of generation gaps still reproducing or became extinct. It is a universal constant. expanding numbers contracting results compounding DNA of previous additions. that exponential 2 forward one added beyond at a time. Not every reproduction becomes a parent. Siblings that do keep the DNA going forward inversely to arrival in each generation gap.

Have you ever seen dna?

 

25 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

every division, reproductive cell's nucleus is the brain of the body delivered at birth with a body having a nervous system so every cell can communicate instinctively functioning to adapt in space mutually evolving forward now as each ancestor has from inception.

Seen a division?

 

Forward, relative to, what?

 

25 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

What are magical forces?

 

25 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

hyperbole

Isn’t hyperbole, hyperbole?

 

26 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

What’s forms?

 

26 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

Spiritual fantasies

 

20 hours ago, solereproduction said:

Thermodynamic  principles covers molecular migration between combined forms to erosion and conceptions to decomposition as exactly occupying time here.

So is that a ‘spiritual fantasy’?

 

27 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

If time exists, is this in time, or out of time? 

 

27 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

Duration of

Is duration of another way of saying time?

 

27 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

What’s a thinker? (Which could think outside skin). 

 

28 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

Denier of self

There’s no thinker, but there’s a denier?

 

28 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

What’s an understander? 

 

29 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

understanding self proportioned being alive now since conceived to replace the 30 lives of one's previous 4 generation gaps lived already so far.

What’s an understander (of understanding self)?

 

29 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

How is doubt reasonable, as compared with felt?

Quote

not comparable, feel is current, felt is a past event that won't exist again.

How is doubt reason-able, if felt is actually feel, and there is no thinker?

Is there ‘a reasoner’?

 

30 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

What’s a denier? 

Quote

an ancestor that believes they exist beyond natural displacement to eternally separated now.

So therein, the denier is not self, but is an ancestor?

 

31 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

Is there generations because there is time?

Quote

No.  Occupying space evolving conceived to decomposed is personal time evolving as eternally separated here in plain sight of everything universally present beyond one's own skin.

Who or what is occupying space?

 

32 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

What if there isn’t time?

Quote

The nothing existed to this point.  Again time isn't a linear algorithm, it is the time the total sum is what remains here next as individually univerally present part within the whole exchange between did and does continue here.

Time isn’t linear, but nothing existed but no longer exists?

 

33 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

Well, that instinct is experienced isn’t per se wrong or right, but is an assumption. A perversion via inversion. 

Quote

Completely accurate or incompletely inaccurate every time recited each generation forward sustaining eternal separation of lifetimes left as current 5 generation gaps evolving now and everyone playing role models to concepts anything else is possible.

Not sure what’s said there really. Five words or less might be clearer. 

 

34 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

What’s a doer?

Quote

lifetime adapting to the moment honestly or corrupted cradle to grave.  

Not sure what’s said there either. One word might be clarifying. 

 

[solereproduction]

1 hour ago, Phil said:

How does one get there? (The there previous to now)

then is past, there is future for evolving here to that point of evolution.

 

1 hour ago, Phil said:

Is duration of another way of saying time?

Don't allow vocabulary to remove your brain from navigating space limited to living eternally separated now. Lost souls seldom recover from giving away their sole time adapting to the moment here.

 

1 hour ago, Phil said:

There’s no thinker, but there’s a denier?

back to don't allow vocabulary to distract you from navigating life as genetics sustains your time here.

 

1 hour ago, Phil said:

What’s an understander (of understanding self)?

Sense of proportionately alive in a body never same total sum again, now as only adapting same as everything else is being what everything else is.

 

1 hour ago, Phil said:

How is doubt reason-able, if felt is actually feel, and there is no thinker?

Is there ‘a reasoner’?

Consensus between ancestries preferring  to stay in character typecast by rule of law and scriptures promising life cannot be limited to time displaced now.

Brain thinks, mind recites previously determined thoughts used by others as well generations adding it into next generations arriving.

 

1 hour ago, Phil said:

So therein, the denier is not self, but is an ancestor?

not accurate,  a sequenced displacement of ancestry never staying same population again.

 

1 hour ago, Phil said:

Who or what is occupying space?

Again who is social consensus and what is evolving as genetically added to ancestral positions present for the time each cycle existed or existing. That compounding binary code of 0 or 1.

 

1 hour ago, Phil said:

Time isn’t linear, but nothing existed but no longer exists?

Time is an immovable objective, molecular migration has become an irresistible force of natural changes combined here now. Guess I need the examples of two sided narratives thinking outside a box and 7 degrees of separation evolving here one reproduction at a time covering last 3 generation gaps alive

 Box symbolizes to sides keeping secretes from one another. Inside and outside

the other figure is core of evolving here one ata time after the vertical two parenting each grandchild of the horizontal 4 grandparents the grandchild arrives in the center balancing with potential to repeat previous generation gaps adding a 4th generation gap.

 

1 hour ago, Phil said:

Not sure what’s said there really. Five words or less might be clearer. 

Static ideas used multiple generations corrupts each generation added believing evolving exceeds being alive now..

 

1 hour ago, Phil said:

How does one get there? (The there previous to now)

 

Have you ever seen dna?

 

Seen a division?

 

Forward, relative to, what?

 

 

Isn’t hyperbole, hyperbole?

 

 

 

So is that a ‘spiritual fantasy’?

 

 

Is duration of another way of saying time?

 

 

There’s no thinker, but there’s a denier?

 

 

What’s an understander (of understanding self)?

 

How is doubt reason-able, if felt is actually feel, and there is no thinker?

Is there ‘a reasoner’?

 

So therein, the denier is not self, but is an ancestor?

 

Who or what is occupying space?

 

Time isn’t linear, but nothing existed but no longer exists?

 

Not sure what’s said there really. Five words or less might be clearer. 

 

Not sure what’s said there either. One word might be clarifying. 

 

Eternity centers eternal separation of things evolving here now.

[Phil]

2 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

1 hour ago, Phil said:

How does one get there? (The there previous to now)

then is past, there is future for evolving here to that point of evolution.

How does one actually get there previous to now, then is past, there is future, that point of evolution?

Can one?

If so, how?

If not, why not?

 

4 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

Don't allow vocabulary to remove your brain from navigating space limited to living eternally separated now. Lost souls seldom recover from giving away their sole time adapting to the moment here.

 

4 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

Is duration of another way of saying time?

Yes, because.. or maybe no, because…

The point of asking is clarity as to what’s being said. 

 

5 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

2 hours ago, Phil said:

There’s no thinker, but there’s a denier?

back to don't allow vocabulary to distract you from navigating life as genetics sustains your time here.

Isn’t navigating life as genetics sustains your time here vocabulary?

If not, what is it? 

 

6 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

2 hours ago, Phil said:

What’s an understander (of understanding self)?

Sense of proportionately alive in a body never same total sum again, now as only adapting same as everything else is being what everything else is.

What’s sense?

 

6 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

2 hours ago, Phil said:

How is doubt reason-able, if felt is actually feel, and there is no thinker?

Is there ‘a reasoner’?

Consensus between ancestries preferring  to stay in character typecast by rule of law and scriptures promising life cannot be limited to time displaced now.

Brain thinks, mind recites previously determined thoughts used by others as well generations adding it into next generations arriving.

So there are thinkers, deniers, reasonable doubters, preferrers, who do and or don’t stay in character… and there is and or isn’t a consensus between? 

 

8 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

2 hours ago, Phil said:

So therein, the denier is not self, but is an ancestor?

not accurate,  a sequenced displacement of ancestry never staying same population again.

So a sequenced displacement of ancestry never staying same population again… is a ‘denier’?

 

9 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

2 hours ago, Phil said:

Who or what is occupying space?

Again who is social consensus and what is evolving as genetically added to ancestral positions present for the time each cycle existed or existing. That compounding binary code of 0 or 1.

If who is social consensus and what is evolving… what is who, social consensus, and evolving?

 

 

10 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

2 hours ago, Phil said:

Time isn’t linear, but nothing existed but no longer exists?

Time is an immovable objective, molecular migration has become an irresistible force of natural changes combined here now. Guess I need the examples of two sided narratives thinking outside a box and 7 degrees of separation evolving here one reproduction at a time covering last 3 generation gaps alive

 Box symbolizes to sides keeping secretes from one another. Inside and outside

the other figure is core of evolving here one ata time after the vertical two parenting each grandchild of the horizontal 4 grandparents the grandchild arrives in the center balancing with potential to repeat previous generation gaps adding a 4th generation gap.

This is an explanation of how time isn’t linear, but nothing existed but no longer exists? 

 

2 hours ago, Phil said:

2 hours ago, solereproduction said:

Well, that instinct is experienced isn’t per se wrong or right, but is an assumption. A perversion via inversion. 

Quote

Completely accurate or incompletely inaccurate every time recited each generation forward sustaining eternal separation of lifetimes left as current 5 generation gaps evolving now and everyone playing role models to concepts anything else is possible.

Not sure what’s said there really. Five words or less might be clearer. 

 

12 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

Static ideas used multiple generations corrupts each generation added believing evolving exceeds being alive now..

Still no idea what’s being said. Five or less words might be more clarifying. One word would be most clear. 

 

13 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

Eternity centers eternal separation of things evolving here now.

Same. 

 

 

It seems like everything said is circular logic. Three cups and no peanut (point). 

 

Perhaps it’s easiest asked, what is ultimate reality? What is absolute? 

It’s only a request of course, but an answer beyond one word would be an unnecessary reply. 

[solereproduction]

5 minutes ago, Phil said:

How does one actually get there previous to now, then is past, there is future, that point of evolution?

surviving the evolving process going on now.

6 minutes ago, Phil said:

Can one?

If so, how?

If not, why not?

Adapting to life never remining same total sum achieved here.  One evolves since conception until dead still occupying space until body decomposes.

 

7 minutes ago, Phil said:

What’s sense?

Really? the balance between looking and seeing, listening and hearing, touching as feeling being touched, smell is 80% taste. Fear, joy, emotional reactions to actions going on all around. 

All that since conceived to replace and living proportionately unique to time displaced.

11 minutes ago, Phil said:

So there are thinkers, deniers, reasonable doubters, preferrers, who do and or don’t stay in character… and there is and or isn’t a consensus between? 

type cast behavior creates stereotypes performing wishing to be more than what they were since birth equal replacements to their own previous 4 generation gaps. Consensus justifies getting away with it by the numbers of we against anyone defying the mog decisions to reinterpret life beyond evolving here now.

 

14 minutes ago, Phil said:

So a sequenced displacement of ancestry never staying same population again… is a ‘denier’?

How convenient you left out the part about each person not accepting the time they get is shared in the moment here equally inhabiting space now.

 

16 minutes ago, Phil said:

This is an explanation of how time isn’t linear, but nothing existed but no longer exists? 

Always leaving out something of the whole. Each cycle of living/reproduction moving combined DNA forward one ancestor at a time creating separate generations gaps between inception and extinction present any rotation of the planet is accountably here by 5 generation gaps separation.

 

19 minutes ago, Phil said:

Still no idea what’s being said. Five or less words might be more clarifying. One word would be most clear. 

Your mind recites what it learned after birth, your brain navigates living as one of a kind now. Seems your brain and what you mind aren't in sync. That is personal choices taken.

[Phil]

1 hour ago, solereproduction said:

1 hour ago, Phil said:

How does one actually get there previous to now, then is past, there is future, that point of evolution?

surviving the evolving process going on now.

Seems rhetorical, or circular. What’s surviving? (Not actually asking). 

 

1 hour ago, Phil said:

1 hour ago, solereproduction said:

3 hours ago, Phil said:

How does one get there? (The there previous to now)

then is past, there is future for evolving here to that point of evolution.

How does one actually get there previous to now, then is past, there is future, that point of evolution?

Can one?

If so, how?

If not, why not?

 

1 hour ago, solereproduction said:

Adapting to life never remining same total sum achieved here.  One evolves since conception until dead still occupying space until body decomposes.

Also seems rhetorical & circular. Seems like all answers are nonanswers. Maybe that’s the intention idk. 

In terms of the thread, I’m no further along so to speak on the point you’re making, if in fact there is one. 

Seems like ‘where did corruption begin’… and then a lot of circular information without any answer. 

Same for any discernible point on correction. 

But again, maybe the point is that there is no point. That would fit as far as I can see. 

 

1 hour ago, solereproduction said:

Your mind recites what it learned after birth, your brain navigates living as one of a kind now. Seems your brain and what you mind aren't in sync. That is personal choices taken.

I’d propose the question ‘what is your mind’, same or similar as ‘who’s brain’, as reciting is being accredited to ‘it’, and much more so what is a your mind, but the likely hood is the response would be more of the same, and there just doesn’t seem to be any interest in going beyond (more accurately prior). Which is fine guidelines wise. The conversations just seems pointless, or, never actually arriving at a point. Totally not meant in any personal way. Just in regard to conversing. If this perspective is way off, single word answers to to where corruption started and anything along the lines of correction would be a good starting point conversationally, just imo. 

[solereproduction]

2 hours ago, Phil said:

Seems rhetorical, or circular. What’s surviving? (Not actually asking). 

Gee time is motionless and evolving leaves nothing the same from arrival to departure of one's reproduced cycle in the same time from conception to decomposition that said lifetime replaced its previous 4 generation gaps living through the same time frame now as they lived here in this atmosphere. any lifetime a reproduction creates after birth is adding another generation gap of total lifetimes passed through the evolving process like any other lifetime of any other species native to this atmosphere.

 

So seems  rhetorical doesn't mean it was rhetoric from my end of the conversation.   I protect my genetic timing at being unique as any one or anything reproductively present past, current, any nxt generation.

your mind and contextual soul defends people practicing pretending nobody knew so nobody can know and anyone saying they understand is insubordinate, traitor, blasphemy towards what people chose to believe rather than taking the time to comprehend compounding results never exceed series parallel time dispalced specifically here now.

 

Self evident.

 

2 hours ago, Phil said:

Also seems rhetorical & circular. Seems like all answers are nonanswers. Maybe that’s the intention idk. 

In terms of the thread, I’m no further along so to speak on the point you’re making, if in fact there is one. 

Seems like ‘where did corruption begin’… and then a lot of circular information without any answer. 

Same for any discernible point on correction. 

But again, maybe the point is that there is no point. That would fit as far as I can see. 

Doing it again using social consensus facts recited for generations, so are cycles circular or linear as a sphere of influence to everything surround it in series parallel displacement each a separate entity?

 

This whole website is about actuality of being, yet most articulate not being self evident displacements in some mystical dimension beyond the time one is evolving specifically alive.  

the irony of intellectually defining life beyond physically eternally separated by genetics here now.  anyone saying everyone is inaccurate will be punished by rule of law criminally or civilly. both protecting civic pride believing reality is larger than the reproductions adapting to the moment here.

 

After all I am discussing correcting reasonable doubt and here you are defending it.

Edited April 20, 2023 by solereproduction

[Phil]

@solereproduction

Time isn’t motion or motionless. Time is apparent. Time is the thought ‘time’, and the thought appears. 

This is apparently not at all a social consensus fact. That time exists seems to be very much be a social consensus fact. 

There’s very literally no one here (defending). 

Doubt’s an emotion. The relevance is doubt’s felt, directly. 

Emotion is neither reasonable nor unreasonable, as those are thoughts about emotion. 

Thoughts over felt is often referred to as conceptualizing, suppression or aversion. 

 

[solereproduction]

53 minutes ago, Phil said:

@solereproduction

Time isn’t motion or motionless. Time is apparent. Time is the thought ‘time’, and the thought appears. 

This is apparently not at all a social consensus fact. That time exists seems to be very much be a social consensus fact. 

There’s very literally no one here (defending). 

Doubt’s an emotion. The relevance is doubt’s felt, directly. 

Emotion is neither reasonable nor unreasonable, as those are thoughts about emotion. 

Thoughts over felt is often referred to as conceptualizing, suppression or aversion. 

 

So when time isn't motion or motionless it is an immovable idea that only gains momentum in power of suggestion between actively evolving results comparing parts f the whole against the whole itself and each other.

 

Dividing space and time as perpetually balancing out outcomes never the same as arrived here anywhere universally now.

Speculating how long it gets one spontaneous position to another doesn't change simultaneously here.

 

So apparently your adopted philosophy is the great divider of the whole creating loopholes for those taking your side believing intellect is a higher evolution than ancestrally present.

 

What is a fool? Person that won't accept life as they exist here now.  Who are the fooled following? Humanity.

[Phil]

3 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

So when time isn't

‘When’ would be a time (in or of which time isn’t). 

This is already the case. 

Time has always been the thought ‘time’, and that thought has only ever appeared Now. 

 

3 minutes ago, solereproduction said:

What is a fool?

Projection. 

 

There is no philosophy here. 

That’s kinda ‘the rub’. 

There’s very literally no one here. 

[solereproduction]

5 minutes ago, Phil said:

‘When’ would be a time (in or of which time isn’t). 

This is already the case. 

Time has always been the thought ‘time’, and that thought has only ever appeared Now. 

Than to when, beginning to end, cycles within cycles, the time what does exist doesn't exist beyond here. Evolving is ongoing process changing total sum achieved centered 30 degrees separating their 31st  arrival repeating the process every 31st addition until no more 31 additions arrive again.

 

How I got the numbers is a universal constant compounding series of events their horizons only exist simultaneously here as spontaneously evolving specifically where, when, what, which, person, place, thing exists now.

Edited April 21, 2023 by solereproduction

[Phil]

@solereproduction

‘Than to when’, ‘the time what does’, ‘events their horizons’ (etc)… these phrases are like saying ‘from who to yesterday’, ‘below forward future’. 

In this frame of reference, there are only two occasions in which this occurs. One is a specialized version of a language shared between siblings at a young age, typically between twins. The other is as a result of trauma and intense emotional suppression. (The modification acts as a wall or defensive mechanism).  This isn’t meant in any personal or accusatory manor, it’s just that only someone speaking the same modification of the English language could converse with you, when you use this modified version. In terms of definitions, such as can be googled and read, the usage of nouns, verbs, adjectives and adverbs in what you’re writing is incongruent. 

[solereproduction]

4 hours ago, Phil said:

@solereproduction

‘Than to when’, ‘the time what does’, ‘events their horizons’ (etc)… these phrases are like saying ‘from who to yesterday’, ‘below forward future’. 

In this frame of reference, there are only two occasions in which this occurs. One is a specialized version of a language shared between siblings at a young age, typically between twins. The other is as a result of trauma and intense emotional suppression. (The modification acts as a wall or defensive mechanism).  This isn’t meant in any personal or accusatory manor, it’s just that only someone speaking the same modification of the English language could converse with you, when you use this modified version. In terms of definitions, such as can be googled and read, the usage of nouns, verbs, adjectives and adverbs in what you’re writing is incongruent. 

You rely on people believing I suffer from Opaque Cogitations 

[Phil]

@solereproduction

Is it possible that the thought people also appears? 

[solereproduction]

59 minutes ago, Phil said:

@solereproduction

Is it possible that the thought people also appears? 

Why ask if it is possible instead of explaining how it arrives through social circle semantics of persons leading people into ideas life exceeds evolving forward now?

[Phil]

@solereproduction

In accordance with direct experience, thought appears.