Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Jonas Long said:

Dunno where you got that about me tbh

Generalizing.

 

15 minutes ago, WhiteOwl said:

@MetaSageNo idea what you are on about or what to reply. Do you have a question or? Maybe you can ask a bit more direct

 

A rant about students and teachers. The tendency to look for fantasy rather than grounded communication.

Basically, what criteria is followed? Agreeableness, likability, honesty, etc?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, MetaSage said:

The tendency to look for fantasy rather than grounded communication.

 

There's a little bit of fantasy in grounded communication and a little bit of grounded communication in fantasy.  This idea that a teacher is standing on solid ground is a myth.  Spirituality is not like science.  You could create any spirituality and ultimately everyone has the right to create their own spirituality.  You are the authority, and teachers are merely influences on you or examples for you to consider on your spiritual path.  Copying a teacher is like learning someone else's lick in music, you don't want to play it verbatim but you want to use it to create better licks of your own.  You want to be able to play the music that comes out of you.  Spirituality is both integrous and original.

Edited by Joseph Maynor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/1/2022 at 3:36 PM, Phil said:

The truth is you are never going to be happy because it simply, fundamentally & literally is not possible. You’re never going to be aware. You’re never going to be conscious. You’re never going to be awake. You will never actually be kind, selfless, loving, whole or good because it’s impossible. 

Why? I get a sense of what you mean, but still would like clear elaboration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MetaSage said:

Why? I get a sense of what you mean, but still would like clear elaboration.

 

4 minutes ago, MetaSage said:

I didn't, I got a sense of what the comments were about by taking an overview. 

 

Cleaned up the comment. Still, why enabling or pro-delusion?

 

https://www.actualityofbeing.com/blog/2024/2/11/o3fwy43gu8k6wlplctkx79302ys2o6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Joseph Maynor said:

 

There's a little bit of fantasy in grounded communication and a little bit of grounded communication in fantasy.  This idea that a teacher is standing on solid ground is a myth.  Spirituality is not like science.  You could create any spirituality and ultimately everyone has the right to create their own spirituality.  You are the authority, and teachers are merely influences on you or examples for you to consider on your spiritual path.  Copying a teacher is like learning someone else's lick in music, you don't want to play it verbatim but you want to use it to create better licks of your own.  You want to be able to play the music that comes out of you.  Spirituality is both integrous and original.

 

Communication is based on an authentic experience, or else it is manipulation. Fantasy isn't grounded on anything "real", factual, objective or solid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By clicking, I agree to the terms of use, rules, guidelines & to hold Actuality of Being LLC, admin, moderators & all forum members harmless.