Why is sex a taboo?

[Someone here]

Isn't sex the most beautiful thing in the world?  Why then there is taboo about it or why its(besides marriage) regarded as a sin in religious orthodoxy?  Why it's regarded as "dirty " or "evil " ? Why are some of the sexual words and sexual organs used as an insult?  Who is responsible for making a negative stigma around sex ? I've read recently Osho's book "from Sex to super consciousness " and I highly recommend it. It frees you from all the guilt and negative reputation around the topic of sexuality. 

[Phil]

Totally! So great to be free of all that dualistic misunderstanding isn’t it? 

[Someone here]

30 minutes ago, Phil said:

Totally! So great to be free of all that dualistic misunderstanding isn’t it? 

Hell yeah man .  I dream of the day humanity wakes the fuck up from demonising sex . That doesn't mean peeps will go around bangin' each others on the streets like animals though  . Im also aware of cultural differences. Its light years the gap between India and USA in terms of what I said in OP doesn't apply to all parts of the world equally .

If you can help me out can you answer my questions in OP? Why demonising sex ?I fucking love women..love orgasms.love licking women and being sucked by women. Sex is good and right. What's not to love?! Pussies need fucking. Somebody's gotta do it!🤣 

Although I'm deprived from it for two years now I'm single  .

 I still remember when i first discovered what an orgasm is during puberty 😂 my first thoughts were something like "Holy shit holy shit holy shit...white stuff came out of my dick. What the fuck did I do? That has to be bad for me. I'm never touching myself again" 

And then the next day I did it again.😂

[Blessed2]

2 hours ago, Someone here said:

Who is responsible for making a negative stigma around sex ?

 

You.

 

Guilt - seriousness - judgement. What the Son of God forgot to laugh at.

 

[Phil]

@Someone here

It’s not really “humanity” “demonizing”, and it’s not really an “India / US” thing. It’s more of a sexuality immaturity & projection playing out, reflected in experience. It’s entirely innocent, and yet it’s also part & parcel of the experience of deprivation. If you’d like the reflection to change, allow the maturity with which intimacy is thought of and shared about to change, simply by ‘sitting with it’ non-reactively. In allowing the more mature aspect of yourself, the non-objectifying side let’s say, you’re allowing sex not to be so taboo, and therein allowing what’s wanted into your experience. 

[Someone here]

18 minutes ago, Blessed2 said:

 

You.

 

Guilt - seriousness - judgement. What the Son of God forgot to laugh at.

 

What ?

[Blessed2]

3 minutes ago, Someone here said:

What ?

 

Just something that's said in acim.

 

[Someone here]

14 minutes ago, Phil said:

@Someone here

It’s not really “humanity” “demonizing”, and it’s not really an “India / US” thing. It’s more of a sexuality immaturity & projection playing out, reflected in experience. It’s entirely innocent, and yet it’s also part & parcel of the experience of deprivation. If you’d like the reflection to change, allow the maturity with which intimacy is thought of and shared about to change, simply by ‘sitting with it’ non-reactively. In allowing the more mature aspect of yourself, the non-objectifying side let’s say, you’re allowing sex not to be so taboo, and therein allowing what’s wanted into your experience. 

Sorry if I said something inappropriate I can edit the comment if you like or feel free to edit it yourself .

I did sound like a horny teenager sorry about that 😂. 

You are right though ..There is hell lot of difference between having sex with a a person you barely know (which might ne what you mean by  objectification)and with a loved person. I've had phone sex with a bunch of gold diggers.. you might feel plessure..but no intimacy or happiness..its just you cum and done .but when you have sex with your partner the feeling is complete different.

 

[Someone here]

7 minutes ago, Blessed2 said:

 

Just something that's said in acim.

 

I see . Would you like to add something that's not from ACIM but your own opinion on the subject? 

[Phil]

@Someone here

Own your dome bruh. If something said seems inappropriate, don’t “outsource” it mentally, own it, have a look at it, allow it to be illuminated. It’s not about what anyone else thinks is or isn’t appropriate, perhaps especially authority figures, teachers and role models - it’s about the inner - alignment & discord. Trusting in yourself as it were. In your own infallible self-inherent guidance. Sex is not exceptional or excluded in this regard. 

 

14 minutes ago, Someone here said:

There is hell lot of difference between having sex with a a person you barely know (which might ne what you mean by  objectification)and with a loved person. I've had phone sex with a bunch of gold diggers.. you might feel plessure..but no intimacy or happiness..its just you cum and done .but when you have sex with your partner the feeling is complete different.

 

Yes, nice. That reads like objectivity vs love. Illusion vs reality. Objectification is ‘holding’ beliefs in separation - separate objects. A inherently defensive mental position. This includes separate selves, beings, and people. The belief obscures the love, peace, beauty, perfection & wholeness you actually are, and is the seeking of love, peace, beauty, perfection & wholeness - in objects, such as “people”. Just as there is no “humanity demonizing”, there are no “gold diggers”. Of the projection of discordant beliefs via the seeking of yourself in an external reality, is the bamboozling of yourself that what’s sought could be found. 

[Someone here]

11 minutes ago, Phil said:

@Someone here

Own your dome bruh. If something said seems inappropriate, don’t “outsource” it mentally, own it, have a look at it, allow it to be illuminated. It’s not about what anyone else thinks is or isn’t appropriate, perhaps especially authority figures, teachers and role models - it’s about the inner - alignment & discord. Trusting in yourself as it were. In your own infallible self-inherent guidance. Sex is not exceptional or excluded in this regard. 

neopets

11 minutes ago, Phil said:

Yes, nice. That reads like objectivity vs love. Illusion vs reality. Objectification is ‘holding’ beliefs in separation - separate objects. A inherently defensive mental position. This includes separate selves, beings, and people. The belief obscures the love, peace, beauty, perfection & wholeness you actually are, and is the seeking of love, peace, beauty, perfection & wholeness - in objects, such as “people”. Just as there is no “humanity demonizing”, there are no “gold diggers”. Of the projection of discordant beliefs via the seeking of yourself in an external reality, is the bamboozling of yourself that what’s sought could be found. 

I get that having all the sex in the world won't "do it " for me . We've discussed this lately.  Happiness and inner peace don't come from  external conditions..and sex is no exception even though its hard to see through the mirage of sex because the "tingles" are just sooo good . 

I don't claim to be enlightened though so maybe I need to go through as many sexual experiences as I can before I can hoesnstly and wholeheartedly say that sex doesn't work .

[Blessed2]

1 hour ago, Someone here said:

I see . Would you like to add something that's not from ACIM but your own opinion on the subject? 

 

It was what I thought with a reference to the book. Cause the book is about being responsible for it.

 

[Mandy]

Because of fear of lack of control. For the same reason there's inhibitions around singing, dancing, art, music, creating. 

[Phil]

21 hours ago, Someone here said:

neopets

The reply seems to have touched on a deflection nerve / habit. Is trusting in yourself as it were, rather than authority figures, teachers and role models something worth exploring, possibly related to what’s wanted (a relationship) and allowing that to manifest?

 

21 hours ago, Someone here said:

I get that having all the sex in the world won't "do it " for me . We've discussed this lately.  Happiness and inner peace don't come from  external conditions..and sex is no exception even though its hard to see through the mirage of sex because the "tingles" are just sooo good . 

I don't claim to be enlightened though so maybe I need to go through as many sexual experiences as I can before I can hoesnstly and wholeheartedly say that sex doesn't work .

Maybe some confusion via conjecture about enlightenment & identity is coming to surface, to be ‘seen’, felt & released, relating to again, authority figures, teachers and role models. 

 

[Reena]

There are no gold diggers was my favorite part. 

[Phil]

@Reena

😂

 

Doesn’t, in a way, sex being taboo, make it… better? 

More exciting or what have you. 

It’s fun. 

[Reena]

Just now, Phil said:

@Reena

😂

 

Doesn’t, in a way, sex being taboo, make it… better? 

More exciting or what have you. 

It’s fun. 

Then Mormons must be having a lot of fun. 

[Phil]

@Reena

😂 Totally… mons literally means ‘a raised body part’. 

Those sob’s. Way ahead of us. 

[Mandy]

@Phil 😆 Oh no, once you see it, you can't unsee it. 

[IAMystery]

Sex without love is the issue. When sex is a result of love and not lust and the driving engine behind the act is pure love, then its done right and is harmoniously aligned with nature or creators thought, then that can be an immensely healing experience, otherwise it should be kept sacred for when wishing to create a new life.